recipe(lt-wikidata-comp-multi): add verified CPU fp32/fp16 recipes#1169
Open
codykk wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
recipe(lt-wikidata-comp-multi): add verified CPU fp32/fp16 recipes#1169codykk wants to merge 1 commit into
codykk wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
codykk
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 22, 2026 12:00
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add verified CPU recipes (fp32 + fp16) for
dell-research-harvard/lt-wikidata-comp-multi. This XLM-RoBERTa checkpoint produces multilingual embeddings for Wikidata entity comparison. Effort L0, Goal L1 (build + perf), Outcome L0 (recipe only). Both precisions build and perf successfully on CPU.Model metadata
What the model does: Produces dense embeddings from multilingual text for Wikidata entity comparison and linking tasks, fine-tuned from XLM-RoBERTa-large on a multilingual Wikidata entity comparison dataset.
Primary user stories:
Supported tasks:
feature-extraction— Optimum vendor-supported (XLMRobertaModel); winml resolves via TasksManager with generic inference class.Model architecture:
config.json(architectures: ["XLMRobertaModel"],model_type: "xlm-roberta") and Optimum vendorWav2Vec2OnnxConfigexport config (verified).Validation and support evidence
Baseline
5deebd42| winml:0.2.0feature-extractionregistered by Optimum forxlm-roberta; winml adds nothing.AutoModel/feature-extractionGoal
Outcome
Highest reached: L1 PASS (build + perf on both precisions). Coverage: full (all target tuples passed). Deferred tuples: none.
Shipped recipes:
examples/recipes/dell-research-harvard_lt-wikidata-comp-multi/cpu/cpu/feature-extraction_fp32_config.jsonexamples/recipes/dell-research-harvard_lt-wikidata-comp-multi/cpu/cpu/feature-extraction_fp16_config.jsonPer-EP/device/precision results
Delta
Recipe delta vs
winml config(auto-config baseline): identical — filed for verifiedcpu/cpucoverage. The production recipe README (examples/recipes/README.md) remains untouched.Analyze summary — component level and op level
Static rule analysis completed; this is compatibility analysis, not runtime execution.
Component-level summary
Op-level summary
Rule-less EPs (CPU): all operator types classified as unknown — no runtime check rules available.
Reproduce commands