Skip to content

Add portable activity-case workflow - #57

Merged
mikeylong merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/activity-case-portable-skill
Sep 1, 2026
Merged

Add portable activity-case workflow#57
mikeylong merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/activity-case-portable-skill

Conversation

@mikeylong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • add a portable canonical JudgmentKit activity-case skill with thin Codex and Claude adapters
  • add infer-first, show-first activity framing with Proceed, Quick framing, and Guided interview pacing
  • propagate and independently revalidate raw brief and attributed context through review, handoff, generation, and frontend implementation boundaries
  • update the MCP, contracts, documentation, site, generated model fixtures, and regression coverage while preserving the 16-tool registry

Validation

  • npm test — passed, including 8/8 evals and the 17-component, 65-scenario, 260-presentation browser matrix with zero raw accessibility violations and zero unresolved incomplete results
  • node scripts/sync-agent-plugin-adapters.mjs --check — passed
  • node scripts/verify-codex-plugin.mjs — passed
  • claude plugin validate --strict packages/claude-plugin — passed
  • independent frozen-diff review — no High, Medium, or Low findings

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
judgmentkit-ai Ready Ready Preview Sep 1, 2026 2:42am UTC

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-01T02:47:45.356645Z 3382027 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3382027350

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/index.mjs
const prefix = text.slice(Math.max(0, match.index - 48), match.index);
const comparator = /\b(?:under|below|less than)\s*$/.test(prefix)
? "lt"
: /\b(?:up to|at most|no more than|maximum(?: of)?|max(?:imum)?(?: of)?)\s*$/.test(prefix)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Allow narrower dollar-denominated workflow limits

When an authority grant uses a leading currency symbol, such as “may approve refunds up to $500,” the parsed prefix ends in up to $, so this regex classifies the constraint as eq instead of lte. Consequently, reviewUiWorkflowCandidate rejects a downstream “Approve refund up to $200” action as unsupported even though it is narrower than the granted limit, contrary to the downstream-narrowing contract; permit an optional leading currency symbol between the comparator and number.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@mikeylong
mikeylong merged commit c298805 into main Sep 1, 2026
5 checks passed
@mikeylong
mikeylong deleted the codex/activity-case-portable-skill branch September 1, 2026 02:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant