Skip to content

Conversation

@Nyholm
Copy link
Contributor

@Nyholm Nyholm commented Dec 27, 2025

Motivation and Context

This follow up from #195 by properly adding the parameter to the constructor. This is of course a BC break. We should merge this before 0.3.0

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit tests and inspector

Breaking Changes

Yes

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@Nyholm Nyholm added the BC Break Breaking the Backwards Compatibility Promise label Dec 27, 2025
@Nyholm Nyholm added this to the 0.3.0 milestone Dec 27, 2025
@chr-hertel
Copy link
Member

@Nyholm the pipeline still needs some attention - or rather the phpstan baseline i guess

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

BC Break Breaking the Backwards Compatibility Promise Status: Needs Work Status: Reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants