[kixelated]

Plans the follow-ups from the 2026-10-27 /quest-complete pass through /quest-plan.

New quests

m0:

• Smoke tests the released packages: Smoke has been red on main since at least 2026-10-24 (moq-dev/moq#6879)
• Backport the frame-start refusal (from moq-dev/moq#6922)

m1:

• Incoming is not a future (from moq-dev/moq#6841)
• Container consumers buffer by backpressure (from moq-dev/moq#6903)
• A stitched switch returns to --delay (from moq-dev/moq#6919)

Edits

• quest/m1/api-audit/strict-paths.md grows to [M]: Path refuses a non-canonical escape so the moq-transport namespace mapping round-trips (from moq-dev/moq#6927).

Not planned

• Backporting fix(mux): retain old program during stitched epoch acquisition #6919: --stitch exists only on main.
• Backporting fix(watch): keep media holes on the current timeline #6903: a rewrite against release's older watch API for a playback glitch.
• Backporting the container bound: it ships in the next cut.

Decisions

Scope

• IntoFuture + JS frames ✅
• Smoke + switch latency ✅
• Path escapes ✅
• Release backports ✅

Incoming IntoFuture (first prompt answered "Either is gross, wtf is that? And why moq-tokio?", re-asked with context)

• Delete the impl ✅
• Reuse Connecting

Frame bound

• Backpressure, both langs ✅
• Count cap, both langs
• JS only

Smoke

• Released API only ✅
• Pin per client
• Go/C only

Catch-up

• Drop the old tail ✅
• Faster slew
• Accept it

Escapes (first prompt answered "we need to fix to_tuple and from_tuple so they're symettrical?", re-asked with the canonical-spelling constraint)

• to_tuple refuses
• Path refuses ✅

Backports

• fix(net): preserve transport frame bounds #6922 JS only ✅
• fix(net): preserve transport frame bounds #6922 + fix(watch): keep media holes on the current timeline #6903
• None

Priority demotion

• Bullet in the latency quest ✅
• Separate quest
• Drop it

Bound backport

• No, ship in next cut ✅
• Yes, m0 backport

Docs

• No new pages ✅
• Add a docs quest

Impact

Quest files only. Public API: none. Wire: none.

Checks

quest check passes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 9 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used all 4 included reviews currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: a0906299-294d-47ee-977b-b6dbcb9ef9cb

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee5ac74 and 172ce95.

Files selected for processing: 11

• quest/m0/README.md
• quest/m0/backport-frame-start.md
• quest/m0/smoke-released.md
• quest/m1/README.md
• quest/m1/api-audit/README.md
• quest/m1/api-audit/strict-paths.md
• quest/m1/container-backpressure.md
• quest/m1/quic-api/README.md
• quest/m1/quic-api/incoming-future.md
• quest/m1/ts-reliability/README.md
• quest/m1/ts-reliability/stitch-catch-up.md

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-27T23:34:14.017366Z	172ce95	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[kixelated]

Automated review by review (OpenAI)
Reviewed commit: 172ce95

No actionable bugs found in this quest-only change. The direction is coherent: keep Smoke on released APIs without weakening freshness, backport the narrow JS refusal rather than the new storage model, remove Incoming's unnecessary future adapter, and make canonical paths symmetric. The backpressure and stitch-catch-up plans appropriately track remaining limitations rather than claiming the earlier PRs fixed them.

Implementation guardrails: the consumer budget should account for retained sample/group overhead and preserve delivery-head progress when later groups consume capacity; test those alongside the planned same-timestamp/many-group cases. Keep repeated-switch monotonicity checks when dropping the old tail.

Verification: static inspection of the plans and relevant consumer, namespace, Incoming, jitter, and Smoke code only. I did not run quest checks, tests, Smoke, or release/backport validation; these runtime fixes remain future work.

[kixelated]

Merge summary for head 172ce95:

• Codex reviewed this head with no findings, and the automated review on this head found no actionable bugs.
• quest check --base origin/main passes (614 documents).
• No changes made during merge. I did not fold in the review's implementation guardrails (count retained sample and group overhead in the consumer budget, keep the delivery head moving, keep monotonicity checks across repeated switches). They are notes for whoever implements those quests, not errors in the plans, and they would only add another review round.

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)