[kixelated]

Problem

rust2-ts needs consumer config and source changes to translate moq's model: a [bind] table, ignore-macros, safe cfg(rust2_ts) twins, and dyn Expiry rewritten as an enum. The README's "Never" list made unsafe and trait objects permanent reasons to bind.

Decisions

Decided with the maintainer on 2026-10-27: a stock Rust crate should translate with no annotations or config.

• Record the principle: ✅ root AGENTS.md, covering ts and ffi · ts/README design goals · ts-model epic plan.
• AGENTS.md wording: ✅ as written · scoped to rust2-ts.
• The "Never" list: ✅ unsafe and trait objects move to "Not yet" · keep "Never".
• Built-in mappings for well-known crates: ✅ plan a quest · not now. Milestone: ✅ m2, in ts-model · m3.
• Trait objects: ✅ m3 · m2 in ts-model.
• moq's safe cfg twins: ✅ stay as a stopgap, with ts-unsafe in m3 retiring them · move ts-unsafe to m2.
• #141's dependencies key: ✅ inferred in feat(ts): translate every non-std dependency the roots reach with the package #141 · kept with a follow-up. That change lands in feat(ts): translate every non-std dependency the roots reach with the package #141.

Changes

• AGENTS.md: one Guidelines line.
• ts/README.md: the "Never" section folds into "Not yet", linking the quests.
• New Well-known crates without config (m2, ts-model) and Trait objects (m3).
• The ts-model epic and ts-unsafe call the twins and consumer bindings stopgaps.

Checks: quest check passes. Only markdown changed.

Public API: none.

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-28T02:19:04.734561Z	799017c	PR opened
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-28T02:19:50.700044Z	799017c	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[kixelated]

Automated review by review (OpenAI)
Reviewed commit: 799017c

No actionable bugs found in this planning-only change. Moving consumer-specific bindings and source rewrites toward translator-owned support is a coherent direction; retaining explicit platform boundaries and refusing unsafe operations outside the modeled set avoids turning zero configuration into silent semantic changes. The small stock-crate mapping milestone is a sensible bridge to source translation, while trait objects correctly retain dispatch, drop, lazy-future, and cancellation requirements.

This records future work, not delivered unsafe/trait-object support. Verification: static inspection of the changed plans and related async/unsafe plans and model configuration only; I did not run quest check, builds, tests, or a model census.

[kixelated]

Merging at 799017c. Codex code and security reviews of this head finished with no findings. quest check --base origin/main passes on the head. The optional Check job was still queued, and the only part of it a markdown-only diff can affect is that quest lint. No changes were made during merge. The decisions are the ones recorded in the PR body.

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)