src: implement initial simdjson parser

[araujogui]

#61577

Input	Native ops	Node ops	Node vs Native
simple-string	4,504,385.62	4,975,922.17	+10.5%
simple-array	703,598.73	562,547.42	−20.0%
simple-object	686,461.43	200,551.63	−70.8%
nested-ascii	202,770.63	67,469.96	−66.7%
nested-unicode	120,913.34	53,919.80	−55.4%
twitter	870.53	277.69	−68.1%

[nodejs-github-bot]

Review requested:

• @nodejs/gyp
• @nodejs/loaders
• @nodejs/startup

[araujogui]

Initial benchmark results:

parse-json/parse.js parser="native" type="small-object" n=100000: 5,367,434.433433749
parse-json/parse.js parser="simdjson" type="small-object" n=100000: 1,570,256.2069283628
parse-json/parse.js parser="native" type="small-array" n=100000: 10,437,233.452627432
parse-json/parse.js parser="simdjson" type="small-array" n=100000: 1,914,118.2972960686
parse-json/parse.js parser="native" type="medium-object" n=100000: 1,572,731.9730512376
parse-json/parse.js parser="simdjson" type="medium-object" n=100000: 411,978.48030408134
parse-json/parse.js parser="native" type="large-array" n=100000: 64,549.22266911664
parse-json/parse.js parser="simdjson" type="large-array" n=100000: 17,891.37742317745
parse-json/parse.js parser="native" type="deep-nesting" n=100000: 1,118,300.8536829143
parse-json/parse.js parser="simdjson" type="deep-nesting" n=100000: 538,687.0436317436
parse-json/parse.js parser="native" type="string-heavy" n=100000: 3,720,053.4765127357
parse-json/parse.js parser="simdjson" type="string-heavy" n=100000: 698,994.1781334098
parse-json/parse.js parser="native" type="number-heavy" n=100000: 616,398.9881120243
parse-json/parse.js parser="simdjson" type="number-heavy" n=100000: 201,247.07782954018

[jsumners-nr]

	native	simdjson
small-object	5,367,434.433433749	1,570,256.2069283628
small-array	10,437,233.452627432	1,914,118.2972960686
medium-object	1,572,731.9730512376	411,978.48030408134
large-array	64,549.22266911664	17,891.37742317745
deep-nesting	1,118,300.8536829143	538,687.0436317436
string-heavy	3,720,053.4765127357	698,994.1781334098
number-heavy	616,398.9881120243	201,247.07782954018

Unless I copied and pasted incorrectly, it looks like this effort will not be beneficial?

[araujogui]

native simdjson
small-object 5,367,434.433433749 1,570,256.2069283628
small-array 10,437,233.452627432 1,914,118.2972960686
medium-object 1,572,731.9730512376 411,978.48030408134
large-array 64,549.22266911664 17,891.37742317745
deep-nesting 1,118,300.8536829143 538,687.0436317436
string-heavy 3,720,053.4765127357 698,994.1781334098
number-heavy 616,398.9881120243 201,247.07782954018

Unless I copied and pasted incorrectly, it looks like this effort will not be beneficial?

I believe it’s too early to reach any conclusions, this PR is very tricky

[AugustinMauroy]

What if you add test to ensure that error between standard json parsing and this new api is near to 1:1. In goal of allowing user to use both without big diff.
It's will also help for adoption so just have to change the function call not their potential parent try/catch statement