Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
72 changes: 72 additions & 0 deletions .github/pull_request_template.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
<!--
Org-wide PR template — SYNCED from nsheaps/.github
(ansible/templates/.github/pull_request_template.md). Local edits are
replaced on the next org sync run; propose changes upstream instead.

Delete any section that genuinely does not apply. Do not delete
"Blast radius" or "Validation performed" — if they are empty, say why.
-->

## What changed

<!--
The actual diff, file by file, in the order a reviewer should read it.
A table works well when several files change for different reasons.
Link to specific lines (`path/to/file.py:120-134`) rather than describing.
-->

## Why

<!--
The problem or requirement this serves. If it came from an issue, a
review comment, or an incident, link it. "Because it was asked for" is
a real reason — say who asked and where.
-->

## Blast radius

<!--
READ THIS SECTION BEFORE APPROVING.

Answer concretely:
- What is affected? (this repo only / N managed repos / all org members)
- When does it take effect? (on merge / on next sync / only for new repos)
- What breaks if this is wrong? What is the rollback?
- What existing behaviour or local decision does this override?

If the change is genuinely inert today (feature-flagged, enforcement
disabled, no consumer yet), say so AND say what would make it live.
-->

## Validation performed

<!--
Paste REAL output — command invocations and their actual results. Not
"tests pass", not a description of what you would run.

Where a test is meant to catch a regression, show that it actually fails
without the fix. An assertion that never fails is not validation.
-->

```
$ <command>
<output>
```

## What a reviewer should scrutinise

<!--
The parts you are least sure about, the trade-offs you made, and any
decision you made unilaterally that the reviewer might have made
differently. Pre-empt the strongest objection to this PR rather than
waiting for review to find it.
-->

1.
2.

## Related

<!-- Issues, prior PRs, specs, Discord threads. Use "Closes #N" to auto-close. -->

-
Loading