-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
fix(gitprovider): skip GitLab approve when the caller's approval already stands #564
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
currentUserApprovedis a read-only helper (two GETs, no writes) placed inrest_writes.go, and it rebuilds the approvals endpoint URL thatListReviewsalready builds verbatim atinternal/gitprovider/gitlab/rest_reads.go:342. Both cut against the package's own file/helper split (U-S1, U-G1): the read helper the write path already depends on,getMergeRequest, lives inrest_reads.go(line 147) and is called fromSubmitReview, and repeated endpoint construction is factored into a named method (c.notesURL,c.discussionsURLindiscussions.go:169) rather than inlined at each call site.Impact is small but it is the kind of drift that compounds: the approvals path/segment ordering now exists in two files and will need editing in both if the endpoint or project-segment handling changes, and reads/writes are no longer cleanly separated by file.
Suggested fix: add
func (c *Client) approvalsURL(ref gitprovider.PRRef) stringnext tonotesURL, use it from bothListReviewsand the new helper, and movecurrentUserApprovedintorest_reads.goalongsidegetMergeRequest(keeping the write-path decision — call it, and skip ontrue— inapprove). No behavior change; the existing tests cover it.The rest of the change reads well: the pre-check keeps
approve's error mapping intact, the 401-vs-standing-approval ambiguity is documented at the call site, the extra/userread is gated on approvals being non-empty, and all three branches (standing approval, others' approvals, genuine 401 on the read) have direct tests.Reply inline to this comment.