Skip to content

Conversation

@ufuomaisaac
Copy link

@ufuomaisaac ufuomaisaac commented Jan 22, 2026

Fixes - Jira-#Issue_Number

Didn't create a Jira ticket, click here to create new.

Please Add Screenshots If there are any UI changes.

Before After
trim.DD8A9707-D371-437B-9E54-E1375B38FC0D.MOV

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

  • Run the static analysis check ./gradlew check or ci-prepush.sh to make sure you didn't break anything

  • If you have multiple commits please combine them into one commit by squashing them.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Recurring deposit account approval workflow: new approval screen, ViewModel, and backend approval action.
  • UI/UX Improvements

    • Date picker, approval reason input, save/confirm flow, success/error feedback, and auto-refresh on resume.
    • Navigation updated to include an approval destination.
  • Other

    • Improved date formatting and added UI strings for the approval flow.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds an approval workflow for recurring deposit accounts: date-format helper change, new serializable approval model, network/service/datamanager + repository API, DI and use-case wiring, ViewModel, navigation and UI screen with date picker and strings, plus a minor Ktor JSON config tweak.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Date utility
core/common/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/core/common/utils/DateHelper.kt
Removed getDateAsLongFromList(...); added apiDateFormat and getDateAsStringForApproval(timeInMillis: Long): String.
Approval model
core/model/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/core/model/objects/template/recurring/approval/RecurringDepositApproval.kt
Added serializable RecurringDepositApproval data class (locale, dateFormat, approvedOnDate?, note?).
Repository & impl
core/data/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/core/data/repository/RecurringAccountRepository.kt, core/data/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/core/data/repositoryImp/RecurringAccountRepositoryImp.kt
Added approveRecurringDepositAccount(accountId: String, approval: RecurringDepositApproval): Flow<DataState<GenericResponse>>.
Network service & datamanager
core/network/src/commonMain/kotlin/.../RecurringAccountService.kt, core/network/src/commonMain/kotlin/.../DataManagerRecurringAccount.kt
Added POST API recurringdepositaccounts/{accountId}?command=approve; datamanager method posts RecurringDepositApproval, handles non-success, decodes GenericResponse.
Ktor JSON config
core/network/src/androidMain/kotlin/com/mifos/core/network/KtorHttpClient.android.kt
Enabled encodeDefaults = true in JSON serializer configuration.
DI & use-case
feature/recurringDeposit/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/feature/recurringDeposit/di/RecurringDepositModule.kt
Registered RecurringDepositAccountApprovalViewModel and ApproveRecurringDepositUseCase bindings.
Navigation
feature/client/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/feature/client/navigation/ClientNavigation.kt, feature/recurringDeposit/src/commonMain/kotlin/.../RecurringDepositAccountApprovalNavigation.kt
Added RecurringDepositAccountApprovalRoute, destination, NavController helper; updated client destinations to accept onApproveAccount / onViewAccount.
UI & ViewModel
feature/recurringDeposit/src/commonMain/kotlin/.../RecurringDepositAccountApprovalScreen.kt, feature/recurringDeposit/src/commonMain/kotlin/.../RecurringDepositAccountApprovalViewModel.kt, feature/client/.../RecurringDepositAccountScreen.kt
New approval screen/composables, ViewModel and use-case wiring, lifecycle-driven refresh in recurring account screen, action mapping for approve/view.
Strings
feature/recurringDeposit/src/commonMain/composeResources/values/feature_recurring_deposit_string.xml
Added UI strings for approval flow (approve account, select date, approved on, approval reason, save, OK, etc.).

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User as User / UI
    participant Screen as RecurringDepositAccountApprovalScreen
    participant VM as RecurringDepositAccountApprovalViewModel
    participant UseCase as ApproveRecurringDepositUseCase
    participant Repo as RecurringAccountRepository
    participant Service as RecurringAccountService
    participant API as Remote API

    User->>Screen: pick date & enter note, tap Save
    Screen->>VM: approveRecurringDepositApplication(accountId, approval)
    VM->>VM: set ShowProgressbar
    VM->>UseCase: invoke(accountId, approval)
    UseCase->>Repo: approveRecurringDepositAccount(accountId, approval)
    Repo->>Service: approveRecurringDepositAccount(accountId, approval)
    Service->>API: POST recurringdepositaccounts/{accountId}?command=approve
    API-->>Service: HttpResponse
    Service-->>Repo: HttpResponse
    Repo->>Repo: decode HttpResponse -> GenericResponse / error
    Repo-->>UseCase: DataState.Success / DataState.Error
    UseCase-->>VM: DataState
    VM-->>Screen: update UI state (success / error)
    Screen->>User: show snackbar/dialog and navigate back on success
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • biplab1
  • TheKalpeshPawar
  • revanthkumarJ

Poem

🐰 I hopped in with a tiny grin,
Dates picked, notes tucked neatly in,
From screen to API they flew,
Approvals stamped — a carrot too,
Hooray! A little hop for you!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2
❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 4.55% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title "Approve button in recurring account Issue" is vague and generic, using non-descriptive phrasing that doesn't clearly convey the scope or nature of the changes made. Revise the title to be more specific about the implementation, such as "Implement recurring deposit account approval workflow" or "Add approval flow for recurring deposit accounts".
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 8

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@core/common/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/core/common/utils/DateHelper.kt`:
- Around line 44-50: The apiDateFormat constant currently uses day() which
produces non-padded days; replace that call with dayOfMonth(Padding.ZERO) in the
apiDateFormat formatter (the LocalDateTime.Format block) so dates are rendered
as "dd MMMM yyyy" (e.g., "05 January 2026") to match the API and the other date
format constants referenced by RecurringDepositAccountApprovalScreen.kt:223.

In
`@core/network/src/androidMain/kotlin/com/mifos/core/network/KtorHttpClient.android.kt`:
- Around line 31-41: The file currently installs ContentNegotiation twice which
causes DuplicatePluginException; remove the redundant
install(ContentNegotiation) block and keep a single installation that preserves
the desired Json settings (ensure ignoreUnknownKeys = true, encodeDefaults =
true, isLenient = true, prettyPrint = true, explicitNulls = false) so the final
install(ContentNegotiation) { json(Json { ... }) } contains all required
options; verify only one call to install(ContentNegotiation) exists and run a
quick build to confirm HttpClient initializes without the duplicate plugin
error.

In
`@feature/client/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/feature/client/navigation/ClientNavigation.kt`:
- Around line 254-265: clientRecurringDepositAccountDestination is passing
onViewAccount as an empty lambda and onApproveAccount forwards accountNumber to
navigateToRecurringDepositAccountApproval which expects accountId; wire the
onViewAccount callback to navigate to the appropriate account view (e.g., call
navController.navigateToRecurringDepositAccount with the same identifier) and
make identifier names consistent: either rename accountNumber to accountId in
the onApproveAccount lambda or adapt the
navigateToRecurringDepositAccountApproval invocation to accept accountNumber,
ensuring RecurringDepositAccountScreen's OnViewAccount event and
navigateToRecurringDepositAccountApproval use the same identifier name/type.

In
`@feature/client/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/feature/client/recurringDepositAccount/RecurringDepositAccountScreen.kt`:
- Line 178: Fix the typo in the TODO comment inside
RecurringDepositAccountScreen (RecurringDepositAccountScreen.kt): replace
"clientimplement" with either "client implement" or simply "implement" (e.g.,
"todo implement search bar functionality") so the TODO reads clearly and
consistently with other comments.
- Around line 76-78: The LaunchedEffect keyed on
navController.currentBackStackEntry causes a duplicate fetch because the
ViewModel already loads data in its init via
checkNetworkAndRecurringDepositAccounts(); remove or change this LaunchedEffect
to avoid the immediate re-fetch: either delete the LaunchedEffect that calls
viewModel.trySendAction(RecurringDepositAccountAction.Refresh) or replace it
with a targeted mechanism that only triggers on return (e.g., observe
NavBackStackEntry.lifecycle events or a navigation result/SharedViewModel flag)
so that refresh runs only when coming back from another screen rather than on
initial composition.

In
`@feature/recurringDeposit/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/feature/recurringDeposit/recurringAccountApproval/RecurringDepositAccountApprovalScreen.kt`:
- Around line 113-121: Replace the hardcoded dialogTitle "OK" in the
RecurringDepositAccountApprovalUiState.ShowRecurringDepositAccountApprovedSuccessfully
branch with a localized string resource; update the MifosAlertDialog call to use
stringResource(Res.string.xxx) (e.g., Res.string.ok or a feature-specific
resource) for dialogTitle so the title is internationalized while keeping
onConfirmation calling navigateBack and other parameters unchanged.
- Line 235: The file defines a local no-op function rememberDatePickerState that
shadows the imported API and causes datePickerState to be Unit; remove this
stubbed function (the rememberDatePickerState declaration) so the code uses the
correct imported rememberDatePickerState and datePickerState will have the
proper type to access selectedDateMillis, or if you intentionally need a local
helper, rename it and match the real API signature to return the proper state
instead of Unit.
- Around line 142-147: The date picker currently uses
SelectableDates.isSelectableDate to allow only dates >= Clock.System.now(),
blocking today and past dates; update the logic in the
datePickerState/selectableDates block (SelectableDates.isSelectableDate) to
allow today and earlier by inverting the comparison (use utcTimeMillis <=
Clock.System.now().toEpochMilliseconds()) or, better, compare dates by LocalDate
(convert utcTimeMillis and now to LocalDate and allow selectable when
candidateDate <= today) so same-day approvals are permitted; adjust the
implementation in RecurringDepositAccountApprovalScreen where datePickerState is
created.
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
feature/client/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/feature/client/recurringDepositAccount/RecurringDepositAccountScreen.kt (1)

232-250: Empty string fallback for null accountNo may cause silent failures.

Passing an empty string when accountNo is null (lines 237, 244) could lead to confusing behavior or failed API calls downstream. Consider either:

  1. Filtering out items with null accountNo from displaying actions, or
  2. Handling the null case explicitly (e.g., showing an error dialog)
Suggested approach: guard against null before dispatching action
                                        onActionClicked = { actions ->
+                                           val accountNo = recurringDeposit.accountNo
+                                           if (accountNo.isNullOrEmpty()) return@MifosActionsSavingsListingComponent
                                            when (actions) {
                                                is Actions.ViewAccount -> {
                                                    onAction(
                                                        RecurringDepositAccountAction.ViewAccount(
-                                                            recurringDeposit.accountNo ?: "",
+                                                            accountNo,
                                                        )
                                                    )
                                                }
                                                is Actions.ApproveAccount -> {
                                                    onAction(
                                                        RecurringDepositAccountAction.ApproveAccount(
-                                                            recurringDeposit.accountNo ?: "",
+                                                            accountNo,
                                                        )
                                                    )
                                                }
                                                else -> Unit
                                            }
                                        }
feature/recurringDeposit/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/feature/recurringDeposit/di/RecurringDepositModule.kt (1)

22-33: Consider using viewModelOf for consistency.

The existing RecurringAccountViewModel uses viewModelOf(::RecurringAccountViewModel) (line 20), while the new RecurringDepositAccountApprovalViewModel uses explicit parameter injection. If SavedStateHandle and ApproveRecurringDepositUseCase are both available via DI, you could simplify:

♻️ Suggested simplification
-    viewModel {
-        RecurringDepositAccountApprovalViewModel(
-            savedStateHandle = get(),
-            approveRecurringDepositUseCase = get()
-        )
-    }
+    viewModelOf(::RecurringDepositAccountApprovalViewModel)

-    factory {
-        ApproveRecurringDepositUseCase(
-            repository = get()
-        )
-    }
+    factory(::ApproveRecurringDepositUseCase)
core/network/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/core/network/services/RecurringAccountService.kt (1)

37-41: Use APIEndPoint.CREATE_RECURRING_DEPOSIT_ACCOUNTS for consistency.

Lines 26 and 31 use APIEndPoint.CREATE_RECURRING_DEPOSIT_ACCOUNTS, but this endpoint uses a hardcoded string. For maintainability and consistency with the rest of the interface, apply the suggested refactor:

♻️ Suggested refactor
-    `@POST`("recurringdepositaccounts/{accountId}?command=approve")
+    `@POST`(APIEndPoint.CREATE_RECURRING_DEPOSIT_ACCOUNTS + "/{accountId}?command=approve")
     fun approveRecurringDepositAccount(
         `@Path`("accountId") accountId: String,
         `@Body` approval: RecurringDepositApproval,
     ): Flow<HttpResponse>
core/model/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/core/model/objects/template/recurring/approval/RecurringDepositApproval.kt (1)

15-22: Prefer immutable properties for request payloads.
These fields look write-once; switching to val avoids accidental mutation.

♻️ Suggested change
-data class RecurringDepositApproval(
-    var locale: String = "en",
-    var dateFormat: String = "dd MMMM yyyy",
-    var approvedOnDate: String? = null,
-    var note: String? = null,
-)
+data class RecurringDepositApproval(
+    val locale: String = "en",
+    val dateFormat: String = "dd MMMM yyyy",
+    val approvedOnDate: String? = null,
+    val note: String? = null,
+)
core/network/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/core/network/datamanager/DataManagerRecurringAccount.kt (1)

56-71: Consider extracting the shared response-mapping logic.
This duplicates the error/success parsing in createRecurringDepositAccount; a helper keeps it consistent and easier to maintain.

Comment on lines 31 to 41
install(ContentNegotiation) {
json(
Json {
ignoreUnknownKeys = true
encodeDefaults = true
isLenient = true
prettyPrint = true
explicitNulls = false
},
)
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

fd -t f "KtorHttpClient.android.kt" | head -5

Repository: openMF/android-client

Length of output: 243


🏁 Script executed:

cat -n core/network/src/androidMain/kotlin/com/mifos/core/network/KtorHttpClient.android.kt | head -80

Repository: openMF/android-client

Length of output: 2500


🌐 Web query:

Ktor HttpClient ContentNegotiation install twice duplicate plugin exception

💡 Result:

Cause

  • The exception means ContentNegotiation was installed more than once with the same plugin key (e.g., installed twice on the same HttpClient or both globally and again in a test/server scope). Ktor throws DuplicatePluginException when a plugin is installed twice. [1][2]

How to fix

  • Ensure you install ContentNegotiation only once per client (or per application scope). Remove the duplicate install (common places: shared client factory, tests that call module twice, or installing on both a parent route and its child incorrectly). [1][3]

How to check/guard in code (client)

  • Use pluginOrNull to see if the plugin is already installed before installing:
    • if (client.pluginOrNull(ContentNegotiation) == null) { /* install */ }
    • or when creating clients, centralize installation in one factory so callers reuse the same configured client. [2]

Example (HttpClient factory)

  • val client = HttpClient(CIO) {
    install(ContentNegotiation) { json() }
    }

Testing tip

  • If tests start your app twice (EngineMain vs application { module(...) } or you call module twice), remove the duplicate startup or use embeddedServer only in one place to avoid reinstalling server plugins. StackOverflow examples show this pattern as a common cause. [3]

Sources

  • Ktor Client ContentNegotiation docs. [1]
  • Ktor API: pluginOrNull for HttpClient. [2]
  • StackOverflow discussion about DuplicatePluginException when modules/tests start things twice. [3]

Consolidate duplicate ContentNegotiation installations (causes DuplicatePluginException).

This file installs ContentNegotiation twice (lines 31–41 and lines 53–62). Ktor throws DuplicatePluginException when the same plugin is installed more than once, preventing HttpClient initialization. Keep one install(ContentNegotiation) block with your desired JSON configuration. Note: the first block includes encodeDefaults = true, which the second lacks—ensure you retain the options you need.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
`@core/network/src/androidMain/kotlin/com/mifos/core/network/KtorHttpClient.android.kt`
around lines 31 - 41, The file currently installs ContentNegotiation twice which
causes DuplicatePluginException; remove the redundant
install(ContentNegotiation) block and keep a single installation that preserves
the desired Json settings (ensure ignoreUnknownKeys = true, encodeDefaults =
true, isLenient = true, prettyPrint = true, explicitNulls = false) so the final
install(ContentNegotiation) { json(Json { ... }) } contains all required
options; verify only one call to install(ContentNegotiation) exists and run a
quick build to confirm HttpClient initializes without the duplicate plugin
error.

Comment on lines 254 to 265
clientRecurringDepositAccountDestination(
navController = navController,
navigateBack = navController::popBackStack,
{},
{},
onApproveAccount = { accountNumber ->
navController.navigateToRecurringDepositAccountApproval(accountNumber)
},
onViewAccount = {},
)

recurringDepositAccountApprovalDestination(
navigateBack = navController::popBackStack,
)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for clientRecurringDepositAccountDestination function definition
rg -n "fun.*clientRecurringDepositAccountDestination" --type=kt -A 10

Repository: openMF/android-client

Length of output: 186


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for recurringDepositAccountApprovalDestination and how it uses parameters
rg -n "fun.*recurringDepositAccountApprovalDestination" --type=kt -A 10

Repository: openMF/android-client

Length of output: 186


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for how onApproveAccount callback is defined in the recurring deposit screen
rg -n "onApproveAccount" --type=kt -B 3 -A 3

Repository: openMF/android-client

Length of output: 91


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for how onViewAccount callback is defined/used
rg -n "onViewAccount" --type=kt -B 3 -A 3

Repository: openMF/android-client

Length of output: 91


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the navigateToRecurringDepositAccountApproval extension function
rg -n "navigateToRecurringDepositAccountApproval" --type=kt -A 5

Repository: openMF/android-client

Length of output: 91


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for clientRecurringDepositAccountDestination function definition
rg -n "fun.*clientRecurringDepositAccountDestination" -A 10

Repository: openMF/android-client

Length of output: 1805


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for recurringDepositAccountApprovalDestination definition
rg -n "fun.*recurringDepositAccountApprovalDestination" -A 10

Repository: openMF/android-client

Length of output: 2090


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for onApproveAccount usage patterns
rg -n "onApproveAccount" -B 2 -A 2

Repository: openMF/android-client

Length of output: 7632


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for onViewAccount usage patterns
rg -n "onViewAccount" -B 2 -A 2

Repository: openMF/android-client

Length of output: 7593


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for navigateToRecurringDepositAccountApproval extension
rg -n "navigateToRecurringDepositAccountApproval" -A 5

Repository: openMF/android-client

Length of output: 2888


Wire the onViewAccount callback and verify the account identifier naming.

The onViewAccount callback is actively used by RecurringDepositAccountScreen (triggered on OnViewAccount event), but it's passed as an empty lambda in the navigation setup. Additionally, the onApproveAccount callback passes accountNumber to navigateToRecurringDepositAccountApproval(), which expects a parameter named accountId—verify these represent the same identifier and use consistent naming throughout.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
`@feature/client/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/feature/client/navigation/ClientNavigation.kt`
around lines 254 - 265, clientRecurringDepositAccountDestination is passing
onViewAccount as an empty lambda and onApproveAccount forwards accountNumber to
navigateToRecurringDepositAccountApproval which expects accountId; wire the
onViewAccount callback to navigate to the appropriate account view (e.g., call
navController.navigateToRecurringDepositAccount with the same identifier) and
make identifier names consistent: either rename accountNumber to accountId in
the onApproveAccount lambda or adapt the
navigateToRecurringDepositAccountApproval invocation to accept accountNumber,
ensuring RecurringDepositAccountScreen's OnViewAccount event and
navigateToRecurringDepositAccountApproval use the same identifier name/type.

@biplab1
Copy link
Contributor

biplab1 commented Jan 23, 2026

@ufuomaisaac Please address the @coderabbitai reviews which are relevant to this PR. Make sure the UI guidelines are being followed as well.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# List all review comments made by CodeRabbit on this PR
gh pr view 2580 --json reviews,comments --jq '.reviews[] | select(.author.login == "coderabbitai") | {state: .state, body: .body, submittedAt: .submittedAt}' 2>/dev/null || echo "No reviews found or error accessing reviews"

# Also get review comments (line-level comments)
gh api "repos/openMF/android-client/pulls/2580/comments" --jq '.[] | select(.user.login == "coderabbitai") | {path: .path, line: .line, body: .body, created_at: .created_at}' 2>/dev/null || echo "No review comments found"

Length of output: 11400


@biplab1 @ufuomaisaac, I found my review from January 23rd with several items that need attention. Here's a summary:

Critical Issues (Must Fix) 🔴

  1. Duplicate Plugin Installation (KtorHttpClient.android.kt):

    • ContentNegotiation is installed twice, causing DuplicatePluginException
    • Remove one of the duplicate blocks and keep a single installation
  2. Date Picker State Issue (RecurringDepositAccountApprovalScreen.kt, Line 235):

    • Local stub function rememberDatePickerState shadows the real API
    • Remove the stub so the actual date picker works correctly
  3. Navigation Wiring (ClientNavigation.kt, Lines 254-265):

    • onViewAccount callback is empty
    • Identifier inconsistency: accountNumber vs accountId
    • Wire the view account navigation properly

Important Fixes 🟡

  1. Date Format Padding (DateHelper.kt, Lines 44-50):

    • Use dayOfMonth(Padding.ZERO) instead of day() for proper "dd MMMM yyyy" format
  2. Date Picker Logic (RecurringDepositAccountApprovalScreen.kt, Lines 142-147):

    • Currently blocks today and past dates; should allow them for approvals
  3. Duplicate Fetch (RecurringDepositAccountScreen.kt, Lines 76-78):

    • LaunchedEffect causes unnecessary re-fetch on initial load
  4. Hardcoded Dialog Title (RecurringDepositAccountApprovalScreen.kt, Lines 113-121):

    • Use string resource instead of hardcoded "OK"
  5. Typo (RecurringDepositAccountScreen.kt, Line 178):

    • Fix "clientimplement" → "implement"

Code Quality Improvements (Nice to Have) 💡

  • Handle null accountNo gracefully instead of empty string fallback
  • Use viewModelOf for consistency in DI
  • Use APIEndPoint constant instead of hardcoded URL
  • Make properties immutable (val vs var)
  • Extract shared response-mapping logic

I'm happy to help clarify any of these items or provide more specific guidance on how to fix them. Just let me know! 🤖

@ufuomaisaac
Copy link
Author

ufuomaisaac commented Jan 24, 2026

@ufuomaisaac Please address the @coderabbitai reviews which are relevant to this PR. Make sure the UI guidelines are being followed as well.

Alright, will work on that. Thank you!

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@ufuomaisaac, sounds good! I'm here if you need any help or clarification on any of the review items as you work through them. Feel free to ping me if you have questions! 👍

1 similar comment
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@ufuomaisaac, sounds good! I'm here if you need any help or clarification on any of the review items as you work through them. Feel free to ping me if you have questions! 👍

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In
`@feature/client/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/feature/client/recurringDepositAccount/RecurringDepositAccountScreen.kt`:
- Around line 232-249: The code currently passes recurringDeposit.accountNo ?:
"" into RecurringDepositAccountAction.ViewAccount and ApproveAccount; instead of
supplying an empty string, first guard for null by reading val accountNo =
recurringDeposit.accountNo and if accountNo is null skip the action (return from
the onActionClicked branch) or surface an error (call the existing error action
handler if available), otherwise call
onAction(RecurringDepositAccountAction.ViewAccount(accountNo)) /
onAction(RecurringDepositAccountAction.ApproveAccount(accountNo)). Update the
onActionClicked lambda handling for Actions.ViewAccount and
Actions.ApproveAccount to use this null check and avoid passing empty
identifiers.

@ufuomaisaac
Copy link
Author

@biplab1, I have resolved all the issues raised by coderabbitai

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In
`@feature/client/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/feature/client/recurringDepositAccount/RecurringDepositAccountScreen.kt`:
- Around line 78-93: The lifecycle observer currently captures a stale snapshot
of state.recurringDepositAccounts because DisposableEffect is keyed only on
lifecycleOwner; update the observer to read the latest value by using
rememberUpdatedState for the relevant state (e.g., val currentAccounts by
rememberUpdatedState(state.recurringDepositAccounts)) and reference
currentAccounts inside the LifecycleEventObserver callback, keeping the
DisposableEffect keyed on lifecycleOwner and still adding/removing the observer;
ensure viewModel.trySendAction(RecurringDepositAccountAction.Refresh) is invoked
when event == Lifecycle.Event.ON_RESUME and currentAccounts.isNotEmpty().
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
feature/recurringDeposit/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/mifos/feature/recurringDeposit/recurringAccountApproval/RecurringDepositAccountApprovalScreen.kt (1)

237-253: Consider narrowing UI-state visibility.

These are internal UI details; marking them internal avoids leaking API surface outside the feature module.

♻️ Suggested change
-sealed class RecurringDepositAccountApprovalUiState {
+internal sealed class RecurringDepositAccountApprovalUiState {
@@
-class RecurringDepositAccountApprovalScreenPreviewProvider :
+internal class RecurringDepositAccountApprovalScreenPreviewProvider :

@ufuomaisaac
Copy link
Author

@biplab1 I have resolved all the issues that were raised by CodeRabbitAi

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants