feat: store content.child_usage_keys in Container search document [FC-0083] [TEAK]#36651
Conversation
…-0083] (openedx#36528) * feat: store content.child_usage_keys in Container search document Stores the draft children + published children (if applicable) Related fixes: * fix: lib_api.get_container does not take a "user" arg * refactor: fetch_customizable_fields_from_container does not need a "user" arg * refactor: moves tags_count into LibraryItem because anything that appears in a library may be tagged. * refactor: remove get_container_from_key from public API API users must use get_container and ContainerMetadata. * refactor: made set_library_item_collections take an entity_key string instead of a PublishableEntity instance, so we don't need to fetch a Container object to call it. * refactor: changed ContainerLink.update_or_create to take the container PK instead of a Container object, since this is enough. Added container_pk to ContainerMetadata to support this. (cherry picked from commit 5b3caa9)
|
Thanks for the pull request, @pomegranited! This repository is currently maintained by Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review. 🔘 Get product approvalIf you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.
🔘 Provide contextTo help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:
🔘 Get a green buildIf one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green. DetailsWhere can I find more information?If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources: When can I expect my changes to be merged?Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible. However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:
💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. |
navinkarkera
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@pomegranited Thanks! 👍
- I tested this: (Tested in master branch and verified cherry picked commit and files)
- I read through the code
- I checked for accessibility issues
- Includes documentation
|
@farhaanbukhsh FYI on backport fix |
Description
Backports #36528 to Teak.
Supporting information
Part of: openedx/frontend-app-authoring#1778
Addresses this comment: https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/pull/36477/files#r2033737978
Private-ref: FAL-4139
Testing instructions
See #36528
Deadline
ASAP