Skip to content

Conversation

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Dec 10, 2025

I backport this for parity with 17.0.19-oracle.

Based on the push to 25. (which is equal to 21).

Simple resolves needed.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8370325 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8370325: G1: Disallow GC for TLAB allocation (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4210/head:pull/4210
$ git checkout pull/4210

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4210
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4210/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4210

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4210

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4210.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 10, 2025

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@GoeLin GoeLin force-pushed the goetz_backport_8370325 branch from 84889b4 to 937ad19 Compare December 11, 2025 13:08
@GoeLin GoeLin changed the title Goetz backport 8370325 backport 53e7ea891d8c3d91340bf1967aa94104f54b467c Dec 11, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title backport 53e7ea891d8c3d91340bf1967aa94104f54b467c 8370325: G1: Disallow GC for TLAB allocation Dec 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 11, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base label Dec 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant