JPG/JPEG metadata removal#77
Conversation
Up to standards ✅🟢 Issues
|
| Metric | Results |
|---|---|
| Complexity | 0 |
| Duplication | 0 |
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes. Give us feedback
|
@sadrasabouri Also, parsing of JPG bytes, is based on its standard (stable for decades), and I had technical reasons for not using PIL here (unlike Best, |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #77 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 72.77% 69.97% -2.80%
==========================================
Files 5 5
Lines 235 283 +48
Branches 58 69 +11
==========================================
+ Hits 171 198 +27
- Misses 42 55 +13
- Partials 22 30 +8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
sadrasabouri
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I reviewed and tested it. It's working perfectly.
Reference Issues/PRs
#50
JPG/JPEGmetadata removal based on jpeg standard(for bytes and markers pattern, stable structure for over 30 years)
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Any other comments?