OCPBUGS-79422: fix single interface uplink validation in NNCP wizard#179
Conversation
|
@upalatucci: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-79422, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
WalkthroughA single numeric constant in PolicyWizard utilities was changed: Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: upalatucci The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest |
When selecting a NIC in the "A single interface" uplink option, the bridge ports are set to two entries (physical NIC + OVS internal interface), but validation expected exactly one port, causing the Next button to stay disabled. Made-with: Cursor
8ac1c53 to
5120be5
Compare
|
/lgtm |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@upalatucci: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-79422, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-4.21 |
|
@upalatucci: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/retest |
|
@upalatucci: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@upalatucci: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-79422: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-79422 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@upalatucci: new pull request created: #183 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Summary
ovs-br1). UpdatedNUM_INTERFACES_FOR_SINGLE_INTERFACE_UPLINKfrom 1 to 2.DEMO
Screen.Recording.2026-03-24.at.20.45.02.mov
Test plan
Made with Cursor