Add structural visual evidence for frontend PRs - #105
Merged
Conversation
bigboateng
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 22, 2026 13:26
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
workflow.pr_visual_evidencepolicy withoff,suggest, andrequireWhy
Frontend PR reviewers should be able to inspect a small set of exact screenshots without requiring projects to adopt a particular framework, committing large media files, or treating screenshots as mechanical proof of correctness.
Developer impact
The field remains backward compatible when omitted. Projects may opt into suggestions or make current evidence a publication requirement. Capture setup stays machine-local and must not edit application dependencies or configuration.
Validation
go test ./...python3 -m unittest tests.test_product_loop(18 tests)git diff --check