Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: f567efecc9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🔗 연관된 이슈
🎯 작업 목적
@DependencyGraph(.shared)의 정적 graph 수명, Swift 6 동시성 경계, source graph 조립과 테스트 경계의 공개 계약 확정📝 작업 내용
📌 요약
DependencyGraphLifetime와@DependencyGraph(.shared)추가Graph.shared정적 조립, source graph 조합, override 분리 경로 구현Sendableclass·actor·@MainActorgraph의 동시성 계약과 compiler diagnostic 추가.shared와 provider.shared·.lazy수명 구분 문서화shared타입 충돌 진단과package접근 수준 검증 추가🔍 상세
final class의.shared는 선언에 직접 작성한 checkedSendable준수에서만 허용@unchecked Sendable,nonisolated(unsafe), runtime registry, reset API, 전역 provider 저장소 미추가shared는 비동기 접근 없이 읽고, 생성 프로퍼티의 actor 격리와Sendable검사는 기존 정책 유지@MainActorgraph의 사용자가 지정한 격리 유지, 자동@MainActor부여 미수행Graph.shared는 정규화한 순서로 각SourceGraph.shared를 한 번 읽은 뒤 조합 graph를 한 번 생성Graph.shared는 원본 Factory만 사용하고, 테스트·Preview는Graph()또는Graph.override(...).build(...)로 독립 graph 생성shared중첩 타입·typealias와 생성 정적 멤버의 충돌을.shared원본 위치에서 진단🔄 변경 흐름
flowchart LR production["운영 Graph.shared"] --> assembly["원본 graph 조립"] source["SourceGraph.shared"] --> assembly assembly --> staticGraph["프로세스 정적 graph"] test["테스트 Preview"] --> instance["Graph() 또는 Graph.override(...).build(...)"] instance --> graphStorage["graph 인스턴스별 provider 저장소"]✅ 검증
swift buildswift build -Xswiftc -strict-concurrency=completeswift testgit diff --check