Skip to content

refactor: Bump eslint from 10.2.1 to 10.7.0#916

Closed
mtrezza wants to merge 1 commit into
parse-community:masterfrom
mtrezza:refactor/eslint-10.7.0
Closed

refactor: Bump eslint from 10.2.1 to 10.7.0#916
mtrezza wants to merge 1 commit into
parse-community:masterfrom
mtrezza:refactor/eslint-10.7.0

Conversation

@mtrezza

@mtrezza mtrezza commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes #908

Changes

Bumps the eslint devDependency from 10.2.1 to 10.7.0 (routine minor). Replaces the Dependabot PR so the commit follows the repository conventions and carries the correct author identity.

Breaking

None. This is a routine minor upgrade with no breaking changes affecting this project; npm run lint passes with no new errors.

Code Changes

None. Only package.json and package-lock.json are updated. The lockfile change is confined to the eslint subtree (eslint 10.2.1 -> 10.7.0, plus @eslint/config-helpers 0.5.5 -> 0.6.0 and @eslint/plugin-kit 0.7.1 -> 0.7.2).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the project’s ESLint tooling to version 10.7.0.
    • Refreshed related linting package resolutions for improved tooling compatibility.

@parse-github-assistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request! We appreciate your effort in improving the project. Please let us know once your pull request is ready for review.

Tip

  • Keep pull requests small. Large PRs will be rejected. Break complex features into smaller, incremental PRs.
  • Use Test Driven Development. Write failing tests before implementing functionality. Ensure tests pass.
  • Group code into logical blocks. Add a short comment before each block to explain its purpose.
  • We offer conceptual guidance. Coding is up to you. PRs must be merge-ready for human review.
  • Our review focuses on concept, not quality. PRs with code issues will be rejected. Use an AI agent.
  • Human review time is precious. Avoid review ping-pong. Inspect and test your AI-generated code.

Note

Please respond to review comments from AI agents just like you would to comments from a human reviewer. Let the reviewer resolve their own comments, unless they have reviewed and accepted your commit, or agreed with your explanation for why the feedback was incorrect.

Caution

Pull requests must be written using an AI agent with human supervision. Pull requests written entirely by a human will likely be rejected, because of lower code quality, higher review effort and the higher risk of introducing bugs. Please note that AI review comments on this pull request alone do not satisfy this requirement. Our CI and AI review are safeguards, not development tools. If many issues are flagged, rethink your development approach. Invest more effort in planning and design rather than using review cycles to fix low-quality code.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 613db996-4bba-423a-8596-021e5d8263b7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0f1c455 and 0074032.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package-lock.json
  • package.json

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

ESLint is upgraded from 10.2.1 to 10.7.0. The lockfile updates ESLint’s resolved metadata and aligns @eslint/config-helpers and @eslint/plugin-kit with their newer versions.

Changes

ESLint dependency upgrade

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update ESLint manifest version
package.json
The eslint development dependency changes from 10.2.1 to 10.7.0.
Synchronize locked ESLint packages
package-lock.json
The lockfile updates ESLint to 10.7.0, upgrades related @eslint packages, and replaces their dependency constraints, resolved URLs, and integrity hashes.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes


Important

Pre-merge checks failed

Please resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional.

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Engage In Review Feedback ❓ Inconclusive No review-thread or feedback metadata is present in the snapshot, so engagement with review comments can’t be verified. Provide the PR review thread or a commit/PR reference showing the feedback discussion and how it was addressed.
✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title matches the PR and correctly describes the ESLint version bump.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The changes satisfy #908 by upgrading eslint and updating the lockfile without altering lint behavior.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed The PR stays in scope, touching only eslint dependency metadata and the lockfile.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Security Check ✅ Passed Only ESLint dependency metadata changed; updated versions are outside GitHub advisory ranges (e.g., @eslint/plugin-kit vuln fixed in 0.3.4, now 0.7.2).
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@mtrezza mtrezza closed this Jul 20, 2026
@mtrezza
mtrezza deleted the refactor/eslint-10.7.0 branch July 20, 2026 02:30
@mtrezza
mtrezza restored the refactor/eslint-10.7.0 branch July 20, 2026 02:31
@mtrezza
mtrezza deleted the refactor/eslint-10.7.0 branch July 20, 2026 10:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant