feat(badges): Splitter artwork + share line

[0xkkonrad]

Summary

Artwork + share line for the SPLITTER badge (Peanut Split migrators). The Peanut Split glove-hand mark as a house-style sticker — generated against the real logo via the badge-draft pipeline, deliberately not anthropomorphised (no face; Konrad's call). Asset manifest regenerated from the api catalog.

Task

TASK-21584 — Settle link carries no invite code — new users hit the invite wall

Risks / breaking changes

• Cross-repo pair: registry entry + campaign live in peanut-api-ts attempt at more fixes #1351. This PR is inert until that deploys (asset + share-line only, both keyed by badge code); safe to merge first — and it should merge before or with attempt at more fixes #1351 so the icon is servable when the badge goes live.
• No code paths changed: one SVG, one generated JSON manifest entry, one BADGE_SHARE_LINES string.

QA

• Badge component suites 53/53 locally; full unit suite 2710/2710 tests.
• check-badge-catalog --ui-root green against this tree (53 assets match the catalog).

Screenshots

Splitter badge (public/badges/splitter.svg)

In-app surfaces are unreachable until #1351 deploys (presentation is API-driven); the asset above is the full visible change. Assets branch pr-assets-2701 is deleted post-merge.

Base note

Based on main, pairing with #1351 (surf-up precedent — see that PR's base note).

[github-actions]

Code-analysis diff

Painscore total: 7096.03 → 7096.17 (+0.14)
Findings: 0 net (+2 new, -2 resolved)

🆕 New findings (2)

• high hotspot — src/components/Badges/badge.utils.ts — 49 commits, +549/-446 lines since 6 months ago
• medium complexity — src/components/Badges/badge.utils.ts — CC 17, MI 58.79, SLOC 64

✅ Resolved (2)

• src/components/Badges/badge.utils.ts — 48 commits, +548/-446 lines since 6 months ago
• src/components/Badges/badge.utils.ts — CC 17, MI 58.97, SLOC 63

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

An error occurred during the review process. Please try again later.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

🧪 UI test report — ✅ all green

Suites

• ✅ unit: 2934 ran, 0 failed, 0 skipped, 52.6s

📊 Coverage (unit)

metric	%
statements	66.3%
branches	51.3%
functions	56.4%
lines	67.0%

⏱ 10 slowest test cases

time	test
4.0s	src/components/Card/share-asset/__tests__/shareAssetLayout.test.ts › never places two stickers in heavy overlap (broad seed sweep)
1.0s	src/utils/__tests__/demo-api.test.ts › isDemoMode() is false when not running under Capacitor
0.4s	src/utils/__tests__/auth-token.test.ts › ignores the guarded marker and falls back to the plain token
0.4s	src/components/Card/share-asset/__tests__/shareAssetLayout.test.ts › every sticker stays within canvas at any count
0.3s	src/utils/__tests__/sentry.utils.test.ts › defaults to the client budget under a browser global
0.3s	src/app/(mobile-ui)/withdraw/__tests__/withdraw-states.test.tsx › Bank withdrawal keeps the $1 minimum for sub-$1 amounts
0.3s	src/app/actions/__tests__/api-headers-extended.test.ts › should not include apiKey in validateInviteCode body
0.3s	src/hooks/__tests__/useCrispTokenId.test.ts › retries then stays undefined when the endpoint keeps failing (no fallback token)
0.3s	src/utils/__tests__/sentry.utils.test.ts › still lets a per-call timeoutMs win over the default
0.3s	src/utils/__tests__/demo-balance.test.ts › resetDemoBalance refills and restarts the TTL window

_{📍 Inline annotations are in the **Unit test report** check above. Coverage artifact: `coverage-unit`. Generated by `.github/workflows/tests.yml`.}

[0xkkonrad]

@coderabbitai review

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
peanut-wallet	Ready	Preview	Aug 17, 2026 4:18pm

[0xkkonrad]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

❌ Action failed

Review failed.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[0xkkonrad]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

❌ Action failed

Review failed.