A front door organised by what the teacher came to do

[peopleworks]

The first half of "make it friendlier for the teacher". No engine changes, no scoring changes, nothing that touches what the tool claims.

The diagnosis, which turned out not to be what I expected

I went in assuming the pages spoke the wrong language. They do not. The baseline page's own heading is already "¿Se parece a quien escribió los otros?", and originality opens with "¿Lo escribieron o lo copiaron?" — both exactly right, both written for a person with a stack of essays.

The navigation was hiding them behind the names of the engines. Analizar · Originalidad · Referencia · Catálogo · Carpeta is the index of the machinery. Nobody wakes up on a Monday wanting a baseline.

What changed

before	after (ES)	after (EN)
Analizar	Un texto	One text
Carpeta	Una carpeta	A folder
Referencia	La misma persona	The same person
Originalidad	Coincidencias	Overlap

Coincidencias over Originalidad is not just shorter: the page shows the passages two documents share and states outright that you judge. Calling it originality implies a verdict on originality that the tool refuses to give.

Plus a four-card band above the editor asking "¿Qué necesitas hacer?", ordered by how a teacher's week actually runs — the stack of submissions before the single text, because the single text is usually the second step of the same afternoon.

Two things that are the point, not the polish

• The folder card stays in a browser — where scanning a folder is impossible — and says "en la aplicación de escritorio" before the click. Hiding it would leave a browser visitor believing the product cannot do this at all, which is the lowest-common-denominator answer HostCapabilities exists to avoid. Sending them to a page that explains why, with no warning on the card, is a small bait, and this project cannot afford small baits.
• The current task is shown, not hidden. A chooser that omits where you already are makes the reader wonder what they missed.

What this deliberately is not

Friendlier must not mean more confident. There is no traffic light, no tick, no reassurance anywhere in this change — we spent the week removing exactly that from the report, the score card, the CLI and the empty state. The band routes and explains; every claim on the page is the one it already made.

Verification

• Rendered, not just read — English and Spanish, both checked in a browser.
• The grid measured at four container widths: 1 column at 390 and 430, 3 at 700, 4 at 900, no horizontal overflow at any, and none contributed by this band (measured A/B by removing it). An earlier headless screenshot appeared to show the page overflowing on a phone; that was the screenshot cropping below the layout width, not a defect.
• 362 tests green; desktop solution builds (the UI is shared, and Folders.IsAvailable is true there, so the folder card links and drops the note).
• The eight task keys are built from a list at run time, so a text search cannot see them and a deleted one would render as the raw key on the front door. Registered as computed keys — proved by deleting one and watching the locale guard fail.

Still open, from the same diagnosis

The second half is the result side: what the teacher does after the number appears. Not in this PR.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code