Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @AryaHassanli, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the parser's ability to handle complex content within AsciiDoc table cells by introducing 'greedy' parsing logic. This allows for more robust and flexible interpretation of cell content, particularly for constructs like conditional preprocessor directives. The changes involve expanding the table grammar with dedicated rules for AsciiDoc-specific elements and updating existing cell parsing mechanisms to leverage these new capabilities. The addition of new test cases ensures the correct functioning of these parsing improvements. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request introduces greedy parsing for table cells using the a (AsciiDoc) style. This is a valuable addition as it allows table cells to contain block-level elements like conditional macros (ifdef, ifndef), which were previously causing parsing issues. The implementation correctly leverages the existing parseBlockCell mechanism to re-parse the collected greedy content. I have identified one significant issue in a debug log that would cause a runtime panic due to an incorrect type assertion.
| debugPosition(c, "TABLE LINES: asciidoc inline table lines (%d), content (%d): \"%s\"\n", len(lines.([]any)), len(content.([]asciidoc.Element)), string(c.text)) | ||
| cellLines = flat(lines.([]any)) | ||
| } else { | ||
| debugPosition(c, "TABLE CELL: asciidoc inline table lines (0), content (%d): \"%s\"\n", len(content.([]any)), string(c.text)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This type assertion will cause a runtime panic when this debug path is executed. content is the result of the AsciiDocInlineTableCellLastLine rule, which returns []asciidoc.Element. In Go, a slice of a specific interface type cannot be asserted to []any (which is []interface{}). You should use content.([]asciidoc.Element) instead, which is consistent with the correct assertion used just a few lines above in line 299.
debugPosition(c, "TABLE CELL: asciidoc inline table lines (0), content (%d): \"%s\"\n", len(content.([]asciidoc.Element)), string(c.text))
No description provided.