Skip to content

Bump gitpython from 3.1.31 to 3.1.35#6

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/pip/gitpython-3.1.35
Closed

Bump gitpython from 3.1.31 to 3.1.35#6
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/pip/gitpython-3.1.35

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Sep 10, 2023

Bumps gitpython from 3.1.31 to 3.1.35.

Release notes

Sourced from gitpython's releases.

3.1.35 - a fix for CVE-2023-41040

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: gitpython-developers/GitPython@3.1.34...3.1.35

3.1.34 - fix resource leaking

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: gitpython-developers/GitPython@3.1.33...3.1.34

v3.1.33 - with security fix

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: gitpython-developers/GitPython@3.1.32...3.1.33

v3.1.32 - with another security update

What's Changed

... (truncated)

Commits
  • c8e303f prepare next release
  • 09e1b3d Merge pull request #1650 from EliahKagan/envcase
  • 8017421 Merge pull request #1647 from CosmosAtlas/master
  • fafb4f6 updated docs to better describe testing procedure with new repo
  • 9da24d4 add test for submodule path not owned by submodule case
  • eebdb25 Eliminate duplication of git.util.cwd logic
  • c7fad20 Fix Windows env var upcasing regression
  • 7296e5c Make test helper script a file, for readability
  • d88372a Add test for Windows env var upcasing regression
  • 11839ab Merge pull request #1648 from EliahKagan/file-protocol
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
    You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

Bumps [gitpython](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython) from 3.1.31 to 3.1.35.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/main/CHANGES)
- [Commits](gitpython-developers/GitPython@3.1.31...3.1.35)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: gitpython
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Sep 10, 2023
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Oct 10, 2023

Superseded by #9.

@dependabot dependabot Bot closed this Oct 10, 2023
@dependabot dependabot Bot deleted the dependabot/pip/gitpython-3.1.35 branch October 10, 2023 20:37
matthewkeough pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
# Aider chat conversation:

USER: will this pickup the github pages jekyll site that is in this repy? Like the _layouts _data _posts etc dirs?

ASSISTANT: Yes, the current Dockerfile and scripts should pick up the GitHub Pages Jekyll site, including directories like `_layouts`, `_data`, `_posts`, etc., because the `COPY . /srv/jekyll` command in the Dockerfile copies the entire current directory (which should include those directories) into the Docker container.

However, to ensure everything works correctly, let's make sure the Dockerfile and scripts are set up to handle the Jekyll site properly. Here are the steps:

1. Ensure the Dockerfile is correctly set up to copy the entire site and install dependencies.
2. Ensure the build and run scripts are correctly set up to build the Docker image and run the container.

Let's review the current state of the files and make any necessary adjustments.

scripts/Dockerfile
```python
# Use the official Jekyll image from Docker Hub
FROM jekyll/jekyll:latest

# Set the working directory
WORKDIR /srv/jekyll

# Copy the current directory contents into the container at /srv/jekyll
COPY . /srv/jekyll

# Install any needed packages specified in Gemfile
RUN bundle install

# Expose port 4000 to the host
EXPOSE 4000

# Run Jekyll server
CMD ["jekyll", "serve", "--host", "0.0.0.0"]
```

scripts/build.sh
```python
#!/bin/bash

# Build the Docker image
docker build -t my-jekyll-site -f scripts/Dockerfile .
```

scripts/run.sh
```python
#!/bin/bash

# Run the Docker container
docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/srv/jekyll" -p 4000:4000 my-jekyll-site
```

These files should work as expected. The `COPY . /srv/jekyll` command in the Dockerfile will copy all the necessary Jekyll site files, including `_layouts`, `_data`, `_posts`, etc., into the Docker container. The `bundle install` command will install any dependencies specified in the `Gemfile`.

To verify, you can run the following commands in your project directory:

```sh
bash scripts/build.sh
bash scripts/run.sh
```

This will build the Docker image and start a container that serves your Jekyll site on `http://localhost:4000`. If you encounter any issues, please let me know!

USER: I ran this command:

 bash scripts/build.sh

And got this output:

#1 [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile
#1 transferring dockerfile: 435B done
#1 DONE 0.0s

#2 [internal] load .dockerignore
#2 transferring context: 101B 0.0s done
#2 DONE 0.0s

#3 [internal] load metadata for docker.io/jekyll/jekyll:latest
#3 DONE 0.6s

#4 [1/4] FROM docker.io/jekyll/jekyll:latest@sha256:400b8d1569f118bca8a3a09a25f32803b00a55d1ea241feaf5f904d66ca9c625
#4 DONE 0.0s

#5 [internal] load build context
#5 transferring context: 250.53kB 0.2s done
#5 DONE 0.2s

#6 [2/4] WORKDIR /srv/jekyll
#6 CACHED

#7 [3/4] COPY . /srv/jekyll
#7 CACHED

#8 [4/4] RUN bundle install
#8 6.277 Could not locate Gemfile
#8 ERROR: process "/bin/sh -c bundle install" did not complete successfully: exit code: 10
------
 > [4/4] RUN bundle install:
#8 6.277 Could not locate Gemfile
------
Dockerfile:11
--------------------
   9 |
  10 |     # Install any needed packages specified in Gemfile
  11 | >>> RUN bundle install
  12 |
  13 |     # Expose port 4000 to the host
--------------------
ERROR: failed to solve: process "/bin/sh -c bundle install" did not complete successfully: exit code: 10

ASSISTANT: The error indicates that the `Gemfile` is not being found in the context being copied into the Docker container. This could be because the `Gemfile` is not in the root directory of your project or it might be missing.

To resolve this, we need to ensure that the `Gemfile` is present in the root directory of your project. If it is not, you should add it. If it is present, we need to make sure it is being copied correctly.

Let's first verify that the `Gemfile` is in the root directory of your project. If it is not, please add it. If it is, we can proceed with the current Dockerfile and scripts.

Assuming the `Gemfile` is present in the root directory, the Dockerfile should work as expected. If the `Gemfile` is in a different directory, please let me know its location so we can adjust the Dockerfile accordingly.

If the `Gemfile` is missing, you can create a basic one with the following content:

Gemfile
```ruby
source 'https://rubygems.org'
gem 'jekyll'
```

Once the `Gemfile` is in place, you can re-run the build script:

```sh
bash scripts/build.sh
```

If you encounter any further issues, please let me know!

USER: please make it

ASSISTANT: Let's create the `Gemfile` in the root directory of your project.

Gemfile
```ruby
<<<<<<< SEARCH
=======
source 'https://rubygems.org'
gem 'jekyll'
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```

This `Gemfile` specifies the source for Ruby gems and includes the `jekyll` gem, which is necessary for your Jekyll site.

After adding this `Gemfile`, you can re-run the build script:

```sh
bash scripts/build.sh
```

This should resolve the issue with the missing `Gemfile` and allow the Docker image to be built successfully. If you encounter any further issues, please let me know!
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants