Skip to content

[executorch][cuda] Autotune SDPA on a visible mask and tune pack GQA with the tile - #24004

Merged
Gasoonjia merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
gh/Gasoonjia/43/orig
Oct 20, 2026
Merged

Gasoonjia merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
gh/Gasoonjia/43/orig

Conversation

@Gasoonjia

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.
ghstack PR number: #23727 by @Gasoonjia
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews
ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/Gasoonjia/43/base
ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/Gasoonjia/43/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main
Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/Gasoonjia/43/orig
Differential Revision: D124908769
@diff-train-skip-merge

…with the tile

Pull Request resolved: #23727

D123681196 declared representative KV lengths for SDPA kernels that read KV_LEN_ptr. Masked calls still autotuned unrepresentative work: fabricated boolean masks were all false, so candidate kernels skipped visible KV blocks. Pack-GQA selection also relied on a fixed tile-utilization heuristic rather than the candidate tile.

Declare Mask_ptr beside KV_LEN_ptr on the forward, decode-split-K and small-query-split-K kernels, using an all-visible mask for each representative KV-length scenario. Each candidate therefore sweeps the declared visible extent. Calls without masks pass zero and remain untouched.

Make PACK_GQA a forward-kernel config dimension. Tune packed and unpacked candidates for GQA, prune packing without GQA, and derive the launch-grid head count from the chosen config. The non-power-of-two kernel keeps its fixed-BLOCK_M rule. Existing masked numerical/reference and autotune-input tests cover the contract.
ghstack-source-id: 451457287
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D124908769](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D124908769/)
@pytorch-bot

pytorch-bot Bot commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/24004

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ No Failures, 192 Pending

As of commit 0f9a035 with merge base 897d28f (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@meta-cla meta-cla Bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Oct 20, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@Gasoonjia
Gasoonjia added this pull request to stack #24012 October 20, 2026 03:42
@Gasoonjia
Gasoonjia merged commit a04a9f9 into main Oct 20, 2026
265 of 272 checks passed
@Gasoonjia
Gasoonjia deleted the gh/Gasoonjia/43/orig branch October 20, 2026 03:43
@Gasoonjia
Gasoonjia deployed to upload-benchmark-results October 20, 2026 06:56 — with GitHub Actions Active

This branch was successfully deployed

2 active deployments
upload-benchmark-results — 0f9a0355 Deployed Oct 20, 2026 by Gasoonjia via upload-benchmark-results #21101
cadence — 0f9a0355 Deployed Oct 20, 2026 by Gasoonjia via hifi-op-test / hifi4 #34136
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants