Typo pass: proofread all chapters and notebooks - #240
Open
DanilSko wants to merge 23 commits into
Open
Conversation
…on, Fragezeichen)
…prachige Literatur)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
A full proofreading pass over all 31 Markdown chapters, the README, and the 6 exercise notebooks. Read start-to-finish (in 7 parallel chunks), every candidate re-verified against the actual files before editing, one commit per changed file.
Clear typos (fixed)
Unambiguous spelling errors, grammar/case-agreement mistakes, duplicated words, and copy-paste debris (stray tabs/double spaces, a missing
</a>tag, inconsistent trailing punctuation on a repeated call-to-action block). Also two technical/build-breaking slips caught while proofreading the surrounding prose:reflection_reflection.md: a[Kapitel 5]link pointed at a non-existent path (corpus_analysis/corpus-analysis_intro) — fixed to the correct docname, confirmed the Sphinx warning disappears.corpus-processing_intro-to-nlp.md:{citep}`tiger` used the wrong MyST citation role (the only place in the repo not using{cite:p}/{cite:t}) — fixed to{cite:p}.Consistency / judgment calls (fixed, called out separately)
Fixed because each is confirmable against the rest of the book or the actual code, not a stylistic judgment call:
ELTEC-DEU→ELTeC-DEU(5 instances, matching the dominant spelling everywhere else)an Hand von→anhandrelativen Daten→relationalen Daten(a "relative" vs. "relational" mix-up incorpus-processing_nlp-annotation.ipynb, duplicated verbatim in an assessment-quiz feedback string — fixed both)Verwaltungswissenschaften→Verwaltungswissenschaft(singular, for parallelism with the other three disciplines listed alongside it)csv→annotations) where the prose no longer matched what the code actually createsNoted, not touched
N-Gram/N-Grams/N-Grammspelling inconsistency, and anAdjektiv-Nomen-Paarevs.Adjektiv-Substantiv-Paareterminology split — both are pervasive and internally consistent within the chapters that use them, so fixing them would need a dedicated pass across many more instances than this one touches.corpus-analysis_analysis.mdthat look arithmetically off (a "jedes zwanzigste Wort" example, and a "Prozentpunkte" label that mixes raw-fraction and percentage-point units) — content/pedagogy judgment calls, left for a domain-expert check rather than silently changed.mainbefore this branch (not introduced or touched by this pass): a broken N-Grams link inresearch-question_operationalization.md, a broken#dateien-schreibencross-notebook anchor incorpus-analysis_syntactic-ngram.ipynb, and aCRITICALbuild error inreflection_reflection.md(anincludedirective referencing an HTML marker that no longer exists inintroduction_learning-outcomes.md). Worth their own issue/PR.Verified
verify_content.py(JSON validity for all.ipynb, Python AST parse for all embedded code cells): clean, before and after.execute_notebooks: off): succeeds, no new warnings introduced by this branch (checked by diffing against a build of unmodifiedmain).