Skip to content

chore: standardize repository maintenance#3

Open
afc163 wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
codex/standardize-rc-infra
Open

chore: standardize repository maintenance#3
afc163 wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
codex/standardize-rc-infra

Conversation

@afc163

@afc163 afc163 commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Refresh the organization README files with Ant Design ecosystem branding.
  • Align the shared workflow template with react-component/rc-test/.github/workflows/test-utoo.yml@main.
  • Add shared funding and grouped Dependabot configuration for repository maintenance.

Refs ant-design/ant-design#58514

Test

  • git diff --check
  • README consistency scan

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@afc163, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 1 minute

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b2a24df3-e761-40d6-85c9-a22faa95032d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f36aca0 and 8920e6f.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .github/dependabot.yml
  • FUNDING.yml
  • LICENSE
  • README.md
  • README.zh-CN.md
  • profile/README.md
  • workflow-templates/react-component-ci.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/standardize-rc-infra

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the repository's GitHub defaults, including adding a Dependabot configuration, funding links, and a Chinese translation of the README. It also simplifies the profile README and migrates the workflow template to use a reusable workflow from react-component/rc-test. Feedback was provided regarding an unnecessary backslash escape inside an HTML <code> tag in profile/README.md which renders literally.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Comment thread profile/README.md Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant