Add support to cache IPK packages for offline install#14
Add support to cache IPK packages for offline install#14meek2100 wants to merge 11 commits intorichb-hanover:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Hi! Thanks for this PR. I have a few thoughts/questions about it before I merge it. Specifically, I'd ask you to spend some time on the README to address the questions below:
Thanks! Rich |
Rename Why a Spare Router.md since "?" is an invalid character for a …
|
That was a good catch about the "?" in the file name. But I still don't understand what this PR is designed to accomplish. Please give me a paragraph or two of explanation. Thanks. |
|
Thanks for the review, I appreciate you taking the time to look at this and sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you. I initially submitted it and then moved on to a new project and forgot until I was reviewing all my old open PRs and then discovered the bug with having a "?" in the name when I tried to reclone it to work on enhancing this with support for both opkg and apks. The new solution is still a work in progress and I'll need to get a router flashed up to the latest dev builds of openWRT to verify it before I submit a PR, so I'll just stick with this one for now and answer your question for why I think this is still valuable even with ASU. 1. Why use this instead of downloading to a laptop?The main advantage of doing this on the router (vs. a laptop) is dependency resolution and architecture matching.
2. Why not just use Attended Sysupgrade (ASU)?ASU is fantastic, but this covers a different "Stock Firmware + Local Packages" use case:
3. How does this work with
|
No description provided.