-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
linux(uclibc): remove redundant records and explicit linking to libutil
#5165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -234,19 +234,6 @@ s! { | |
| pub _f: [c_char; 0], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| pub struct glob_t { | ||
| // FIXME(ulibc) | ||
| pub gl_pathc: size_t, | ||
| pub gl_pathv: *mut *mut c_char, | ||
| pub gl_offs: size_t, | ||
| pub gl_flags: c_int, | ||
| __unused1: Padding<*mut c_void>, | ||
| __unused2: Padding<*mut c_void>, | ||
| __unused3: Padding<*mut c_void>, | ||
| __unused4: Padding<*mut c_void>, | ||
| __unused5: Padding<*mut c_void>, | ||
| } | ||
|
Comment on lines
-237
to
-248
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "linux(uclibc): remove conflicting records": The message currently says:
Who does this affect at all? The definitions look identical
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. i didn't mean the changes to have an effect on end users. i meant that the changes were only to the x86_64 module. that's why i top it off by saying that it should virtually affect nobody. |
||
|
|
||
| pub struct cpu_set_t { | ||
| // FIXME(ulibc) | ||
| #[cfg(target_pointer_width = "32")] | ||
|
|
@@ -276,16 +263,6 @@ s! { | |
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| s_no_extra_traits! { | ||
| pub struct dirent { | ||
| pub d_ino: crate::ino64_t, | ||
| pub d_off: off64_t, | ||
| pub d_reclen: u16, | ||
| pub d_type: u8, | ||
| pub d_name: [c_char; 256], | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // constants | ||
| pub const ENAMETOOLONG: c_int = 36; // File name too long | ||
| pub const ENOTEMPTY: c_int = 39; // Directory not empty | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"linux(uclibc): remove explicit linking to libutil" seems reasonable to me, especially with #5265
View changes since the review