Skip to content

use LocalDefId instead of HirId in trait resolution to simplify the obligation clause resolution#103902

Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
vincenzopalazzo:macros/obligation_rulesv2
Jan 25, 2023
Merged

use LocalDefId instead of HirId in trait resolution to simplify the obligation clause resolution#103902
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
vincenzopalazzo:macros/obligation_rulesv2

Conversation

@vincenzopalazzo
Copy link
Member

@vincenzopalazzo vincenzopalazzo commented Nov 2, 2022 •
edited
Loading

This commit introduces a refactoring suggested by @lcnr to simplify the obligation clause resolution.

This is just the first PR that introduces a type of refactoring, but others PRs will follow this to introduce name changing to change from the variable name from body_id to something else.

Fixes #104827

Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com

@rustbot r? @lcnr

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 2, 2022

r? @nagisa

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 2, 2022
@rustbot rustbot assigned lcnr and unassigned nagisa Nov 2, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@vincenzopalazzo vincenzopalazzo force-pushed the macros/obligation_rulesv2 branch from a8d2b49 to c7f97b2 Compare November 2, 2022 20:49
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
lcnr
lcnr reviewed Nov 3, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

didn't yet look through everything, will do the rest of this PR later

@vincenzopalazzo vincenzopalazzo force-pushed the macros/obligation_rulesv2 branch from c7f97b2 to 16dc523 Compare November 3, 2022 08:38
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
cjgillot
cjgillot reviewed Nov 3, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@vincenzopalazzo vincenzopalazzo force-pushed the macros/obligation_rulesv2 branch from 41028d8 to 73e2d77 Compare November 4, 2022 21:46
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
cjgillot
cjgillot reviewed Nov 4, 2022
View reviewed changes
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 4, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #103978) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

cjgillot
cjgillot reviewed Nov 7, 2022
View reviewed changes
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Nov 8, 2022

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 8, 2022
@vincenzopalazzo vincenzopalazzo force-pushed the macros/obligation_rulesv2 branch from 73e2d77 to e263973 Compare November 8, 2022 19:24
@rustbot rustbot added the T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) label Nov 8, 2022
@cjgillot cjgillot mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2022
Merged
@vincenzopalazzo vincenzopalazzo force-pushed the macros/obligation_rulesv2 branch from e263973 to bafe349 Compare November 8, 2022 20:45
@vincenzopalazzo
Copy link
Member Author

vincenzopalazzo commented Nov 8, 2022

@rustbot r? @cjgillot

@rustbot label -S-waiting-on-author +S-waiting-on-review

@rustbot rustbot assigned cjgillot and unassigned lcnr Nov 8, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 23, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 7d2c110 with merge 7953c4b0d4f5a2d237eca649840ff1f8c048b78d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 23, 2023

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 23, 2023
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

cjgillot commented Jan 23, 2023

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 23, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 24, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 7d2c110 with merge 8e4fe1c424fb53f568412de91412d244d96f868d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 24, 2023

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 24, 2023
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jan 24, 2023

@bors retry timeout

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 24, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

rust-log-analyzer commented Jan 24, 2023

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

rust-log-analyzer commented Jan 24, 2023

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 25, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 7d2c110 with merge b98e2203189b297d9f2800668e7b84e62d79b7b0...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

rust-log-analyzer commented Jan 25, 2023

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 25, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jan 25, 2023

@bors retry unable to access 'https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch.git/': Failed to connect to github.com port 443: Connection timed out

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 25, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 7d2c110 with merge 027c850...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 25, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing 027c850 to master...

1 similar comment
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 25, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing 027c850 to master...

@xFrednet xFrednet mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2023
Closed
This was referenced Jan 25, 2023
Merged
Merged
Merged
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

rust-timer commented Jan 25, 2023

Finished benchmarking commit (027c850): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 -0.3% [-0.3%, -0.2%] 4
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 -0.4% [-0.5%, -0.3%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.3% [-0.3%, -0.2%] 4

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 3.5% [3.5%, 3.5%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 2.4% [2.2%, 2.9%] 5
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 -2.0% [-3.0%, -1.0%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.5% [3.5%, 3.5%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@bors bors mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@oli-obk oli-obk oli-obk requested changes

@cjgillot cjgillot cjgillot left review comments

@lcnr lcnr lcnr left review comments

+2 more reviewers

@compiler-errors compiler-errors compiler-errors requested changes

@deltragon deltragon deltragon left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@cjgillot cjgillot

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.69.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

internal compiler error: local_def_id: no entry for HirId