Closed
Conversation
Collaborator
|
|
Collaborator
|
Collaborator
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
Member
|
It is always my preference to have changes in a release but I am happy to acknowledge it is merely a preference. |
Member
|
I think we need to explicitly include a dependency on https://crates.io/crates/windows-link on the appropriate platform. |
Contributor
|
A release would be nice to unblock #145516 |
Member
|
I created a PR to fix this #151680. The problem is backtrace and std need to be updated in tandem due to changes in how we use windows-bindgen. |
Member
Author
Zalathar
added a commit
to Zalathar/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2026
Update backtrace and windows-bindgen Supersedes the backtrace bump in rust-lang#151659 This is mostly just renaming `windows_targets` to `windows_link` but it needs to be done in tandem with the backtrace submodule update. The reason for doing this is that backtrace is both copy/pasted into std (via being a submodule) and published as an independent crate.
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2026
Rollup merge of #151680 - ChrisDenton:bindgen, r=tgross35 Update backtrace and windows-bindgen Supersedes the backtrace bump in #151659 This is mostly just renaming `windows_targets` to `windows_link` but it needs to be done in tandem with the backtrace submodule update. The reason for doing this is that backtrace is both copy/pasted into std (via being a submodule) and published as an independent crate.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2026
Update backtrace and windows-bindgen Supersedes the backtrace bump in rust-lang/rust#151659 This is mostly just renaming `windows_targets` to `windows_link` but it needs to be done in tandem with the backtrace submodule update. The reason for doing this is that backtrace is both copy/pasted into std (via being a submodule) and published as an independent crate.
JonathanBrouwer
added a commit
to JonathanBrouwer/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2026
…t, r=tgross35 Bump `std`'s `backtrace`'s `rustc-demangle` Alternative to rust-lang#151659. Fixes rust-lang#151548.
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/compiler-builtins
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
…ss35 Bump `std`'s `backtrace`'s `rustc-demangle` Alternative to rust-lang/rust#151659. Fixes rust-lang/rust#151548.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/stdarch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2026
…ss35 Bump `std`'s `backtrace`'s `rustc-demangle` Alternative to rust-lang/rust#151659. Fixes rust-lang/rust#151548.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates git submodule
backtracemainly to include the changes from PR rust-lang/backtrace-rs#746. Note that these changes haven't been released yet, although that shouldn't really matter or do you see it as a requirement?Locally I've confirmed that it fixes #151548. I don't think it warrants a regression test (esp. since backtrace tests are rather fragile aren't they?).
I'm actually not sure if only bumping the version of
rustc-demangleinlibrary/std/Cargo.tomlforbacktracewould've sufficed 😅. I went to great lengths updatingbacktracesince I had to face "package version conflicts" and similar back in PR #150843 when I pointedrustc-demangleandbacktraceto my personal forks. In hindsight though I guess these errors occurred for other reasons.r? workingjubilee (rust-lang/backtrace-rs#746) or reassign