Skip to content

interpreter error reporting: remove arguments that are always the same#153613

Open
RalfJung wants to merge 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
RalfJung:interpret-report
Open

interpreter error reporting: remove arguments that are always the same#153613
RalfJung wants to merge 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
RalfJung:interpret-report

Conversation

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@RalfJung RalfJung commented Mar 9, 2026

This report function is called twice and both callers use the same span and get_span_and_frames... so let's just fix those arguments inside the function, no need to be more generic than this.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 9, 2026

Some changes occurred to the CTFE machinery

cc @oli-obk, @lcnr

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 9, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 9, 2026

r? @jdonszelmann

rustbot has assigned @jdonszelmann.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: compiler
  • compiler expanded to 69 candidates
  • Random selection from 15 candidates

)
crate::const_eval::report(ecx, error, move |diag, span, frames| {
// FIXME(oli-obk): figure out how to use structured diagnostics again.
diag.code(E0080);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the error code is also shared by both invocations - might be nice to put in report

@jdonszelmann
Copy link
Contributor

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 11, 2026
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

Makes sense! I then found some more opportunities for cleanups. :)
@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 11, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 12, 2026

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants