fix(status): honor active first scanner cycle - #192
Merged
overtrue merged 1 commit intoAug 2, 2026
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request
Description
RustFS reports
current_cycle_activeseparately because scanner cycle ID0is a valid active first cycle. The Running Status page previously inferred activity only fromcurrent_cycle > 0, so an active first cycle was displayed asNever run.This change preserves the explicit activity field during metrics normalization and treats it as authoritative. When the field is absent, the Console retains the legacy nonzero-cycle fallback for compatibility with older RustFS nodes.
Type of Change
Testing
Checklist
Related Issues
Related to rustfs/rustfs#5163.
Screenshots (if applicable)
N/A. The change corrects the status derived from the existing metrics response without changing layout or styling.
Additional Notes
The explicit field was added by rustfs/rustfs#5397. The fallback keeps the Console compatible with RustFS versions that do not yet emit it.