Skip to content

Version Packages - #102

Merged
sutisnamulyana merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
changeset-release/main
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

Version Packages#102
sutisnamulyana merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
changeset-release/main

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.

Releases

@sawala/cli@0.14.2

Patch Changes

  • 917500d: sawala kontena entry create/update/delete and the matching sawala_kontena_create_entry, sawala_kontena_update_entry and sawala_kontena_delete_entry MCP tools now work when you name the schema by its slug — previously they failed with NOT_FOUND (…/schemas/<slug>) for every schema.

    The commands look the schema up first to decide whether to write to the single or the collection content route, and that lookup only resolves a schema's ULID. The content route it feeds only resolves the schema's slug, so the identifier that made the write succeed was exactly the one that made the lookup fail, and there was no value that worked for both. The lookup now falls back to listing the project's schemas and matching by slug, the same way sawala kontena schema get already did. When the schema really is absent you get Schema 'x' not found. Available slugs: … instead of a bare NOT_FOUND.

@sawala/mcp@0.4.1

Patch Changes

  • 917500d: sawala kontena entry create/update/delete and the matching sawala_kontena_create_entry, sawala_kontena_update_entry and sawala_kontena_delete_entry MCP tools now work when you name the schema by its slug — previously they failed with NOT_FOUND (…/schemas/<slug>) for every schema.

    The commands look the schema up first to decide whether to write to the single or the collection content route, and that lookup only resolves a schema's ULID. The content route it feeds only resolves the schema's slug, so the identifier that made the write succeed was exactly the one that made the lookup fail, and there was no value that worked for both. The lookup now falls back to listing the project's schemas and matching by slug, the same way sawala kontena schema get already did. When the schema really is absent you get Schema 'x' not found. Available slugs: … instead of a bare NOT_FOUND.

@sutisnamulyana
sutisnamulyana merged commit d180002 into main Aug 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant