Skip to content

TON testadapter#1615

Open
archseer wants to merge 17 commits intomainfrom
ton-testadapter
Open

TON testadapter#1615
archseer wants to merge 17 commits intomainfrom
ton-testadapter

Conversation

@archseer
Copy link
Contributor

@archseer archseer commented Jan 30, 2026

// EVM allows empty extraArgs
return nil, nil
case chain_selectors.FamilyTon:
// TODO: maybe for 1.6 we should look up the source adapter and use a 1.6 method to encode? would be good to avoid other chain SDKs
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agree with the comment. I think when we see chain packages importing other chain packages, it's an anti-pattern. It brings us closer to tight coupling.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 yeah lets avoid this

@archseer archseer marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2026 05:48
@archseer archseer requested review from a team as code owners February 13, 2026 05:48
@github-actions
Copy link

Metric ton-testadapter main
Coverage 70.0% 69.7%

- name: getAllAuthorizedCallers
access: public

- contract_name: FeeQuoter
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: can we maintain the versioning ordering, meaning 1.6.3 goes at the top

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ mockery: $(mockery) ## Install mockery.

.PHONY: extract-bytecode-abi
extract-bytecode-abi: ## Extract bytecode and abi from versioned gobindings to bytecode and abi directories
Copy link
Collaborator

@RensR RensR Feb 13, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can remove this, it's part of the wrapper generation and doesn't have to be called on its own. It being part of the wrappers means it can never produce outdated results.

I had already removed it on the develop branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants