[kupratyu-splunk]

Summary

• Update the customer setup guide with the validated SAIA and Slim/AITK token-validation callback path through private Traefik.
• Record the successful AITK inference and the correlated Traefik responses for the Splunk JWKS and current-context endpoints.
• Clarify that SPLUNK_ISSUERS is a JWT issuer allowlist, not a TLS trust setting.
• Add a separate AI POD/OpenShift validation plan for the same boundary, including the proposed external Traefik handoff to the existing HTTP Routes.

Validation

• k0s: ran the AITK inference SPL using the gemma connection and received a result.
• k0s: Traefik logged HTTP 200 for /services/authorization/tokens-keys and /services/authentication/current-context at 2026-11-05 07:54:07 UTC.
• k0s: from the Slim pod, the JWKS probe returned HTTP 200 and unauthenticated current-context returned HTTP 401.
• k0s: confirmed the Traefik file-provider route uses the configured CA and server name for HTTPS to Splunk on port 8089.
• AI POD: plan only; no OpenShift AI POD environment was tested. The document marks all AI POD checks as not run and does not apply k0s evidence to AI POD.
• git diff --check passed for the committed plan.

Evidence limitation

Traefik's k0s access log records the source node rather than the pod, and both SAIA and Slim were scheduled on that node. The callback entries are time-correlated with the AITK run, not a pod-identity record. The AI POD plan is not a FIPS certification claim for any exact Traefik image or cryptographic module.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-04T18:49:58.346569Z	ebb4b2a	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ebb4b2ab8e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".