Skip to content

Update asm to v9.11 - #2434

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/asm
Open

renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/asm

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
org.ow2.asm:asm-util (source) 9.10.1 → 9.11 age confidence
org.ow2.asm:asm (source) 9.10.1 → 9.11 age confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • Every 6 hours (* */6 * * *)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 127dfa1f-9d52-45f7-b771-fe1657395349

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@testlens-app

testlens-app Bot commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚨 TestLens detected 2 failed tests 🚨

Test Summary

Tip

Inspect all details with the TestLens CLI: testlens pr 2434

Verify PRs / Build and Verify (2.5, 8, windows-latest) > :spock-specs:test

Test Runs Flakiness
PollingConditionsSpec > succeeds if all conditions are eventually satisfied with condition method '#conditionMethod' and local variable > succeeds if all conditions are eventually satisfied with condition method '.call' and local variable ❌ 1% 🟡

Verify PRs / Build and Verify (4.0, 8, windows-latest) > :spock-specs:test

Test Runs Flakiness
BlockingVariablesSpec > failing example 1 - variable has wrong value ❌ 1% 🟡

🏷️ Commit: ec9438f
▶️ Tests: 125341 executed
⚪️ Checks: 39/39 completed

Test Failures

PollingConditionsSpec > succeeds if all conditions are eventually satisfied with condition method '#conditionMethod' and local variable > succeeds if all conditions are eventually satisfied with condition method '.call' and local variable (:spock-specs:test in Verify PRs / Build and Verify (2.5, 8, windows-latest))
org.spockframework.runtime.SpockMultipleFailuresError: Multiple Failures (4 failures)
	org.spockframework.runtime.UnallowedExceptionThrownError: Expected no exception to be thrown, but got 'org.spockframework.runtime.SpockTimeoutError'
	org.spockframework.runtime.UnallowedExceptionThrownError: Expected no exception to be thrown, but got 'org.spockframework.runtime.SpockTimeoutError'
	org.spockframework.runtime.UnallowedExceptionThrownError: Expected no exception to be thrown, but got 'org.spockframework.runtime.SpockTimeoutError'
	org.spockframework.runtime.UnallowedExceptionThrownError: Expected no exception to be thrown, but got 'org.spockframework.runtime.SpockTimeoutError'
	at org.spockframework.runtime.ErrorInfoCollector.assertEmpty(ErrorInfoCollector.java:32)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.IterationNode.execute(IterationNode.java:52)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.IterationNode.execute(IterationNode.java:13)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.SpockNode.sneakyInvoke(SpockNode.java:40)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.IterationNode.lambda$around$0(IterationNode.java:68)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformSpecRunner.lambda$createMethodInfoForDoRunIteration$5(PlatformSpecRunner.java:244)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.model.MethodInfo.invoke(MethodInfo.java:157)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformSpecRunner.invokeRaw(PlatformSpecRunner.java:442)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformSpecRunner.invoke(PlatformSpecRunner.java:425)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformSpecRunner.runIteration(PlatformSpecRunner.java:226)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.IterationNode.around(IterationNode.java:68)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.IterationNode.around(IterationNode.java:13)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.ParameterizedFeatureChildExecutor.execute(ParameterizedFeatureChildExecutor.java:104)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformParameterizedSpecRunner$1.runIteration(PlatformParameterizedSpecRunner.java:75)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.extension.IDataDriver.lambda$static$0(IDataDriver.java:38)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformParameterizedSpecRunner.runParameterizedFeature(PlatformParameterizedSpecRunner.java:47)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.ParameterizedFeatureNode.execute(ParameterizedFeatureNode.java:55)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.ParameterizedFeatureNode.execute(ParameterizedFeatureNode.java:31)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.SpockNode.sneakyInvoke(SpockNode.java:40)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.FeatureNode.lambda$around$0(FeatureNode.java:73)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformSpecRunner.lambda$createMethodInfoForDoRunFeature$4(PlatformSpecRunner.java:208)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.model.MethodInfo.invoke(MethodInfo.java:157)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformSpecRunner.invokeRaw(PlatformSpecRunner.java:442)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformSpecRunner.invoke(PlatformSpecRunner.java:425)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformSpecRunner.runFeature(PlatformSpecRunner.java:199)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.FeatureNode.around(FeatureNode.java:73)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.FeatureNode.around(FeatureNode.java:30)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doJoin(ForkJoinTask.java:389)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.join(ForkJoinTask.java:719)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.SpockNode.sneakyInvoke(SpockNode.java:40)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.SpecNode.lambda$around$0(SpecNode.java:72)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformSpecRunner.lambda$createMethodInfoForDoRunSpec$0(PlatformSpecRunner.java:66)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.model.MethodInfo.invoke(MethodInfo.java:157)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformSpecRunner.invokeRaw(PlatformSpecRunner.java:442)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformSpecRunner.invoke(PlatformSpecRunner.java:425)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.PlatformSpecRunner.runSpec(PlatformSpecRunner.java:59)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.SpecNode.around(SpecNode.java:72)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.SpecNode.around(SpecNode.java:12)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doJoin(ForkJoinTask.java:389)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.join(ForkJoinTask.java:719)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1056)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1692)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:175)
BlockingVariablesSpec > failing example 1 - variable has wrong value (:spock-specs:test in Verify PRs / Build and Verify (4.0, 8, windows-latest))
Expected exception of type 'org.spockframework.runtime.ConditionNotSatisfiedError', but got 'org.spockframework.runtime.SpockTimeoutError'
	at org.spockframework.runtime.extension.builtin.FailsWithInterceptor.intercept(FailsWithInterceptor.java:44)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.extension.MethodInvocation.proceed(MethodInvocation.java:139)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.extension.builtin.TimeoutInterceptor.intercept(TimeoutInterceptor.java:99)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.extension.MethodInvocation.proceed(MethodInvocation.java:139)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.model.MethodInfo.invoke(MethodInfo.java:157)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.model.MethodInfo.invoke(MethodInfo.java:157)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doJoin(ForkJoinTask.java:389)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.join(ForkJoinTask.java:719)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.model.MethodInfo.invoke(MethodInfo.java:157)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doJoin(ForkJoinTask.java:389)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.join(ForkJoinTask.java:719)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1056)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1692)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:175)
Caused by: BlockingVariable.get() timed out after 1.00 seconds
	at spock.util.concurrent.BlockingVariable.get(BlockingVariable.java:114)
	at spock.util.concurrent.BlockingVariablesImpl.get(BlockingVariablesImpl.java:35)
	at spock.util.concurrent.BlockingVariables.getProperty(BlockingVariables.groovy:110)
	at spock.util.concurrent.BlockingVariablesSpec.failing example 1 - variable has wrong value(BlockingVariablesSpec.groovy:63)

Rerun Controls

Select tests to mute in this pull request:

  • BlockingVariablesSpec > failing example 1 - variable has wrong value
  • PollingConditionsSpec > succeeds if all conditions are eventually satisfied with condition method '#conditionMethod' and local variable

Reuse successful test results:

  • ♻️ Only rerun the tests that failed or were muted before

Click the checkbox to trigger a rerun:

  • Rerun jobs

Learn more about TestLens at testlens.app/docs.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants