Skip to content

Conversation

@yadij
Copy link
Contributor

@yadij yadij commented Dec 10, 2025

  • trivial whitespace cleanup
  • reposition for alphabetical naming order
  • move SQUID_DEFINE_BOOL inside the check macro

@yadij
Copy link
Contributor Author

yadij commented Dec 10, 2025

FTR; these changes have already passed review in PR #1157.

@yadij yadij added M-cleared-for-merge https://github.com/measurement-factory/anubis#pull-request-labels S-could-use-an-approval An approval may speed this PR merger (but is not required) backport-to-v7 maintainer has approved these changes for v7 backporting labels Dec 10, 2025
@yadij
Copy link
Contributor Author

yadij commented Dec 21, 2025

These changes have reached 10+ days without any negative feedback. The merge bot should have committed them already.

@rousskov rousskov removed M-cleared-for-merge https://github.com/measurement-factory/anubis#pull-request-labels S-could-use-an-approval An approval may speed this PR merger (but is not required) labels Dec 21, 2025
@yadij yadij requested a review from rousskov December 23, 2025 21:57
@yadij yadij added the S-waiting-for-reviewer ready for review: Set this when requesting a (re)review using GitHub PR Reviewers box label Dec 23, 2025
kinkie
kinkie previously approved these changes Dec 25, 2025
@yadij
Copy link
Contributor Author

yadij commented Dec 30, 2025

Blocked for 3 weeks by @rousskov because lines of text unrelated to this PR exist in the Squid code.

@kinkie
Copy link
Contributor

kinkie commented Dec 30, 2025

Blocked for 3 weeks by @rousskov because lines of text unrelated to this PR exist in the Squid code.

The comment has been resolved, the related change merged. @rousskov can this go in now?

@rousskov
Copy link
Contributor

Blocked for 3 weeks by @rousskov because lines of text unrelated to this PR exist in the Squid code.

The above assertion is false.

@rousskov rousskov dismissed their stale review December 30, 2025 21:17

My concern has been addressed.

@rousskov rousskov removed their request for review December 30, 2025 21:17
@rousskov rousskov added S-waiting-for-author author action is expected (and usually required) and removed S-waiting-for-reviewer ready for review: Set this when requesting a (re)review using GitHub PR Reviewers box labels Dec 30, 2025
squid-anubis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2025
* trivial whitespace cleanup
* reposition for alphabetical naming order
* move SQUID_DEFINE_BOOL inside the check macro
@squid-anubis squid-anubis added M-waiting-staging-checks https://github.com/measurement-factory/anubis#pull-request-labels M-passed-staging-checks https://github.com/measurement-factory/anubis#pull-request-labels M-abandoned-staging-checks https://github.com/measurement-factory/anubis#pull-request-labels and removed M-waiting-staging-checks https://github.com/measurement-factory/anubis#pull-request-labels M-passed-staging-checks https://github.com/measurement-factory/anubis#pull-request-labels labels Dec 30, 2025
squid-anubis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2025
* trivial whitespace cleanup
* reposition for alphabetical naming order
* move SQUID_DEFINE_BOOL inside the check macro
@squid-anubis squid-anubis added M-waiting-staging-checks https://github.com/measurement-factory/anubis#pull-request-labels M-passed-staging-checks https://github.com/measurement-factory/anubis#pull-request-labels and removed M-abandoned-staging-checks https://github.com/measurement-factory/anubis#pull-request-labels M-waiting-staging-checks https://github.com/measurement-factory/anubis#pull-request-labels labels Dec 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport-to-v7 maintainer has approved these changes for v7 backporting M-passed-staging-checks https://github.com/measurement-factory/anubis#pull-request-labels S-waiting-for-author author action is expected (and usually required)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants