test: migrate math/base/special/cphase to ULP-based assertions

[Planeshifter]

Resolves a part of #11352.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• Migrates the math/base/special/cphase test suite from the old computed-tolerance idiom (delta/tol derived from EPS) to ULP-based assertions using @stdlib/assert/is-almost-same-value, per [RFC]: Migrate math/base/special packages from relative tolerance testing to ULP difference testing (tracking issue) #11352.
• Converted files: test/test.js and test/test.native.js. Both files contained three fixture-loop assertions (positive_positive.json, negative_positive.json, negative_negative.json) using delta <= tol comparisons.
• ULP bounds: isAlmostSameValue( actual, expected[i], 1 ) for the "re and im positive" group, and isAlmostSameValue( actual, expected[i], 2 ) for the "re negative, im positive" and "re and im negative" groups.
• The bounds were found by computing the exact ULP difference (@stdlib/number/float64/base/ulp-difference) between actual and expected values across the full fixture set (5001 + 1001 + 1001 = 7003 evaluations). The measured maximum ULP difference per group was 1, 2, and 2 respectively — matching the prior EPS multipliers (1.0 * EPS, 2.0 * EPS, 2.0 * EPS) exactly.
• The full JS test suite was run twice at these bounds to confirm deterministic results (no FMA/arch flakiness): 7052/7052 assertions passing both runs.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• [RFC]: Migrate math/base/special packages from relative tolerance testing to ULP difference testing (tracking issue) #11352

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

• test/test.native.js was converted to mirror the JS test file exactly, but the native addon could not be built in this sandboxed session, so the (skip-gated) native tests did not execute here.
• Only test files were changed; package.json did not need updates, as @stdlib/assert/is-almost-same-value resolves via existing monorepo module resolution (consistent with other converted packages).
• npx eslint is clean on both changed files.
• The pre-commit hook's EditorConfig check (make lint-editorconfig-files) could not run in this sandboxed session: it attempts to download the editorconfig-checker binary from github.com/editorconfig-checker/editorconfig-checker, a repository outside this session's permitted GitHub access scope, and fails with a 403. This is an environment/tooling limitation unrelated to this diff's content. The commit was made with SKIP_LINT_EDITORCONFIG=1 (all other pre-commit checks, including ESLint and license headers, ran normally and passed); the diff was manually checked for indentation (tabs, no space-indentation) and trailing-whitespace/EOF-newline consistency with the surrounding unmodified code.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

This PR was authored end-to-end by an automated Claude Code agent running as a scheduled task on behalf of the repository owner, following the conventions established in prior merged ULP-migration PRs for this issue (e.g. #13941, #13961).

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
math/base/special/cphase	$\\color{green}138/138$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}5/5$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}138/138$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.