Skip to content

Complete Array-1#1979

Open
dhruvil15 wants to merge 1 commit intosuper30admin:masterfrom
dhruvil15:master
Open

Complete Array-1#1979
dhruvil15 wants to merge 1 commit intosuper30admin:masterfrom
dhruvil15:master

Conversation

@dhruvil15
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Product Except Self (Sample.java)

Your solution is excellent! You have successfully implemented an efficient algorithm that runs in O(n) time and uses O(1) extra space (excluding the output array). Here are some strengths and minor suggestions:

Strengths:

  • You correctly used two passes (left-to-right and right-to-left) to compute the product without division.
  • The code is clean, well-commented, and easy to follow.
  • You maintained a running product (rp) to avoid using extra arrays for prefix and suffix products.

Areas for improvement:

  1. While rp is a reasonable abbreviation, consider using more descriptive names like runningProduct to enhance readability, especially for others who might read your code.
  2. You might want to add a brief comment explaining why you initialize result[0] to 1 (because there are no elements to the left of the first element, so the product of left elements is 1).
  3. Although not necessary, you could combine the initialization of the first element with the left pass by starting the loop from i=0 and adjusting the index. However, your current approach is clear and correct.

Overall, your solution is optimal and meets all the problem requirements. Great job!

VERDICT: PASS


Diagonal Traverse

It appears that you have submitted a solution for the wrong problem. The problem you solved is "Product of Array Except Self", but the problem you were asked to solve is "Diagonal Traverse". Please review the problem statement carefully and implement the correct solution.

For the "Diagonal Traverse" problem, you need to traverse an m x n matrix in a diagonal order. The typical approach involves simulating the diagonal traversal by changing directions (up-right or down-left) when you hit the boundaries of the matrix.

Here are some steps to consider for the correct solution:

  1. Initialize variables: current row (r=0), current column (c=0), and a direction flag (e.g., dir=true for moving up-right, false for down-left).
  2. Iterate through all elements (m*n times):
    • Add the current element to the result.
    • Based on the current direction, update r and c:
      If moving up-right (dir=true):
      - If at the last column (c==n-1), move down (r++) and change direction.
      - Else if at the first row (r==0), move right (c++) and change direction.
      - Else, move up-right (r--, c++).
      If moving down-left (dir=false):
      - If at the last row (r==m-1), move right (c++) and change direction.
      - Else if at the first column (c==0), move down (r++) and change direction.
      - Else, move down-left (r++, c--).
  3. Return the result array.

You can refer to the reference solution provided in the problem for a clear implementation.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Spiral Matrix

It appears that you have submitted a solution for the "Product of Array Except Self" problem instead of the "Spiral Matrix" problem. Please ensure that you are solving the correct problem. For the spiral matrix problem, you need to traverse the matrix in a spiral order and return all elements in that order.

For the spiral matrix problem, consider using a layer-by-layer approach with boundaries (top, bottom, left, right) that you adjust after traversing each direction. This is a common and efficient method. You can refer to the reference solution provided for guidance.

Strengths:

  • Your code for the product problem is clean and efficient, showing that you understand how to solve that problem effectively.

Areas for Improvement:

  • Always double-check the problem statement and ensure your solution matches the problem requirements.
  • For the spiral matrix problem, you need to handle matrix traversal carefully, ensuring you cover all elements without missing or duplicating any.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants