Skip to content

completed array-1#1989

Open
yashhh-23 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
yashhh-23:master
Open

completed array-1#1989
yashhh-23 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
yashhh-23:master

Conversation

@yashhh-23

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Product Except Self (daigonaltraverse.java)

  1. Wrong Problem: The submitted solution solves "Diagonal Traverse" (LeetCode 498), not "Product Except Self" (LeetCode 238). Please ensure you're working on the correct problem.

  2. If this was intentional: If you meant to submit a solution for Diagonal Traverse, note that your solution appears correct for that problem - it properly handles direction changes at boundaries and correctly builds the result array.

  3. For Product Except Self: The correct approach would be:

    • Use prefix and suffix products (two-pass approach)
    • Or maintain running product while building result from left and right
    • Avoid O(n²) nested loops as shown in the reference solution

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Diagonal Traverse (prodself.java)

Strengths:

  • The solution is well-commented and explains the approach clearly
  • Optimal time and space complexity for the intended problem
  • Clean, readable code structure
  • Correctly handles edge cases (initializing result[0] = 1)

Critical Issue:

  • Wrong Problem: The submitted solution solves "Product of Array Except Self" but the assigned problem is "Diagonal Traverse". This is a significant mismatch that needs to be addressed.

Recommendation:
To pass this evaluation, you need to submit a solution for the Diagonal Traverse problem. The reference solution shows an approach using two variables (r, c for row and column) with a direction flag (dir) that alternates between moving up-right and down-left through the matrix. Study that approach and implement it correctly for the Diagonal Traverse problem.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Spiral Matrix (spiralmatrix.java)

Strengths:

  • The solution is clean, well-commented, and easy to understand
  • Proper boundary checks prevent index out of bounds errors
  • Optimal time and space complexity
  • Follows the same algorithmic approach as the reference solution correctly

Areas for Improvement:

  • Consider using more descriptive variable names like left and right instead of l and r for better readability (though this is minor)
  • The solution is essentially identical to the reference, which is excellent for correctness but could benefit from any personal touches or optimizations

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants