Skip to content

Bump compat for OrdinaryDiffEqLowStorageRK and Trixi#295

Open
benegee wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
bg/lowstoragerk-v3
Open

Bump compat for OrdinaryDiffEqLowStorageRK and Trixi#295
benegee wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
bg/lowstoragerk-v3

Conversation

@benegee
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@benegee benegee commented May 21, 2026

Also use Trixi.Threaded(), xref: trixi-framework/Trixi.jl#3003

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 22, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.11%. Comparing base (cbdf3b0) to head (2f2c33e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #295   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.11%   96.11%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        1260     1260           
  Branches       74       74           
=======================================
  Hits         1211     1211           
  Misses         45       45           
  Partials        4        4           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 96.11% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@benegee benegee changed the title Bump compat for OrdinaryDiffEqLowStorageRK to 3 Bump compat for OrdinaryDiffEqLowStorageRK an Trixi May 22, 2026
@benegee benegee changed the title Bump compat for OrdinaryDiffEqLowStorageRK an Trixi Bump compat for OrdinaryDiffEqLowStorageRK and Trixi May 22, 2026
@benegee benegee requested a review from sloede May 22, 2026 09:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants