Skip to content

docs(rfc): fold the shipped resource-ID decision into the workflow RFC - #816

Closed
behinddwalls wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
preetam/rfc-resource-ids
Closed

behinddwalls wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
preetam/rfc-resource-ids

Conversation

@behinddwalls

@behinddwalls behinddwalls commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Why?

Queue-scoped decimal IDs shipped (#770, #804), but the decision still lived in a standalone discussion RFC that described "current vs proposed" forms. RFCs describe the system as it is on main, so the decision belongs in the RFC that owns ID minting.

What?

  • Add a Resource IDs section to doc/rfc/submitqueue/workflow.md: format, scope, what platform/base/id enforces, and rejected alternatives.
  • Delete doc/rfc/scoped-resource-ids.md and its index entry; the Stovepipe workflow RFC links to the new section.
  • Fix stale ID descriptions: history ordering no longer "parses the counter" out of main/10-style IDs, and the list RFC no longer mentions parsing the queue from an sqid.

Test Plan

✅ bazel test //tool/docsite:site_test (strict link check)
✅ No remaining references to the deleted RFC or to prefixed IDs in Markdown, Go, or proto comments

## Summary

### Why?

Queue-scoped decimal IDs shipped (#770, #804), but the decision still lived in a standalone discussion RFC that described "current vs proposed" forms. RFCs describe the system as it is on main, so the decision belongs in the RFC that owns ID minting.

### What?

- Add a **Resource IDs** section to `doc/rfc/submitqueue/workflow.md`: format, scope, what `platform/base/id` enforces, and rejected alternatives.
- Delete `doc/rfc/scoped-resource-ids.md` and its index entry; the Stovepipe workflow RFC links to the new section.
- Fix stale ID descriptions: history ordering no longer "parses the counter" out of `main/10`-style IDs, and the list RFC no longer mentions parsing the queue from an sqid.

## Test Plan

✅ `bazel test //tool/docsite:site_test` (strict link check)
✅ No remaining references to the deleted RFC or to prefixed IDs in Markdown, Go, or proto comments
@behinddwalls

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Folded into #815.

@behinddwalls
behinddwalls deleted the preetam/rfc-resource-ids branch October 8, 2026 02:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant