Skip to content

chore: dual-license under MIT OR Apache-2.0 - #125

Open
xtqqczze wants to merge 1 commit into
uutils:mainfrom
xtqqczze:license
Open

xtqqczze wants to merge 1 commit into
uutils:mainfrom
xtqqczze:license

Conversation

@xtqqczze

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes #53

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.09%. Comparing base (3f5db7d) to head (0bf4895).
⚠️ Report is 77 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #125      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.64%   86.09%   +7.44%     
==========================================
  Files          13       16       +3     
  Lines        2585     3933    +1348     
  Branches      230      265      +35     
==========================================
+ Hits         2033     3386    +1353     
+ Misses        552      545       -7     
- Partials        0        2       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
macos_latest 85.91% <ø> (+8.27%) ⬆️
ubuntu_latest 85.68% <ø> (+7.50%) ⬆️
windows_latest 15.40% <ø> (+0.70%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed

codspeed Bot commented Sep 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merging this PR will improve performance by 12.11%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
✅ 23 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 9 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
⚡ three 39-bit primes (u128) 480.2 ms 428.3 ms +12.11%

Tip

Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing xtqqczze:license (995d3df) with main (866bc2c)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 9 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

@xtqqczze xtqqczze changed the title chore: dual-license under Apache-2.0 or MIT chore: dual-license under MIT OR Apache-2.0 Sep 26, 2026
Comment thread COPYRIGHT Outdated
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0>.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
<LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please also update the license badge in README.md, it still says Apache 2 and links to LICENSE

Comment thread LICENSE-APACHE
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
Apache License

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the old LICENSE is still there, please remove it (or git mv it)

@xtqqczze
xtqqczze force-pushed the license branch 4 times, most recently from 10ddee5 to 995d3df Compare September 27, 2026 10:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Proposal: Dual-licensing under Apache 2.0 or MIT

2 participants