Skip to content

Draft improvements from assistant conversations: pricing clarifications#310

Open
mintlify[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
mintlify/370eb8dd
Open

Draft improvements from assistant conversations: pricing clarifications#310
mintlify[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
mintlify/370eb8dd

Conversation

@mintlify

@mintlify mintlify Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Address recurring assistant conversations about free API access, VVV staking flow, and uncensored model naming by expanding the pricing page.

Changes

  • Added a "Is there a free API tier?" section that spells out there is no zero-cost model, clarifies the Pro app allowances do not apply to the API, and points users to the two paths that avoid per-request USD charges (VVV staking, Pro credit).
  • Added an "Earn daily credits by staking VVV" walkthrough with the buy → stake → earn → spend steps, the venice.ai/token entry point, the two on-chain transactions, and the 0.1 DIEM accrual threshold before DIEM is spendable.
  • Added an "Uncensored and permissive models" section explaining the *-uncensored*, *-heretic*, and role-play naming conventions, why CONTENT_POLICY_VIOLATION can still be returned by non-uncensored models, and how to combine those variants with include_venice_system_prompt: false.

Context

Recent assistant query buckets showed repeated questions on "free APIs", where the staking button is and how staking works, and how models like GLM Heretic and Venice Uncensored differ from their base checkpoints — with several threads left unanswered. All facts were cross-checked against the existing pricing table, guides/getting-started/generating-api-key-agent.mdx, and api-reference/api-spec.mdx.

@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
veniceai 🟢 Ready View Preview Jul 3, 2026, 12:11 PM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants