Share tree display traversal and rendering - #9280
1 benchmark regressed
⚡ 7 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1929 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 51 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(1000, 64, 8)] |
1 ms | 1.1 ms | -10.95% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compact_sliced[(16384, 10)] |
1.9 ms | 1.4 ms | +36.09% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compact_sliced[(4096, 10)] |
514.7 µs | 385.2 µs | +33.61% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | chunked_canonicalize_into[(1000, 50, 8, 64)] |
17.5 ms | 15.6 ms | +11.81% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | chunked_canonicalize_into[(1000, 50, 8, 4)] |
14.6 ms | 13.2 ms | +10.73% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compact[(16384, 10)] |
4.9 ms | 4.4 ms | +10.38% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compact[(4096, 10)] |
1.3 ms | 1.1 ms | +10.08% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | chunked_into_canonical[(1000, 50, 8, 4)] |
16.9 ms | 15.3 ms | +10.01% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing agent/shared-tree-display (8753468) with develop (adab5b8)2
Footnotes
-
51 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
develop(66c447e) during the generation of this report, so adab5b8 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩