Chain filter evaluations for every conjunct - #9282
Draft
joseph-isaacs wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
failed
Aug 7, 2026 in 0s
Performance Regression: -1.72%
⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1925 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 56 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | decode_varbin[(1000, 2)] |
62.3 µs | 77.7 µs | -19.85% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(10000, 64, 8)] |
9.5 ms | 10.7 ms | -10.73% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress[u64, (10000, 4)] |
361 µs | 311.1 µs | +16.04% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress[u64, (1000, 16)] |
72.6 µs | 64.6 µs | +12.35% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing claude/layoutreader-v1-chain-conjuncts-efkqk3 (5e9d4b4) with claude/layoutreader-v1-scan-perf-efkqk3 (0cb8b3f)
Footnotes
-
56 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
Loading