Skip to content

perf: allow cross-crate inlining of BitBuffer accessors - #9285

Merged
connortsui20 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
ct/inline-buffers
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

perf: allow cross-crate inlining of BitBuffer accessors#9285
connortsui20 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
ct/inline-buffers

perf: allow cross-crate inlining of BitBuffer accessors

bc1c689
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Aug 7, 2026

2 benchmarks regressed

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 7 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1928 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 51 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=16384/indices=16] 1.2 ms 1.3 ms -10.5%
Simulation chunked_into_canonical[(1000, 50, 8, 64)] 17.8 ms 19.8 ms -10.08%
Simulation slice_vortex_buffer 14.4 µs 10.9 µs +32.96%
Simulation decompress[u32, (10000, 256)] 100.4 µs 82.9 µs +21.08%
Simulation set_indices_vortex_buffer[128] 2.2 µs 1.9 µs +18.28%
Simulation bitwise_not_vortex_buffer[1024] 7.4 µs 6.3 µs +16.34%
Simulation bitwise_not_vortex_buffer[2048] 7.8 µs 6.8 µs +15.32%
Simulation bitwise_not_vortex_buffer[128] 9.1 µs 8.1 µs +11.92%
Simulation iter_vortex_buffer[128] 2 µs 1.8 µs +11.46%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing ct/inline-buffers (bc1c689) with develop (66c447e)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 51 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.