Share primitive binary operand decoding - #9295
Merged
Merged
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
succeeded
Aug 8, 2026 in 0s
Performance Gate Passed
⚡ 5 improved benchmarks
✅ 1939 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 85 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=1024/indices=1000] |
6.4 ms | 5.6 ms | +14.52% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=1024/indices=256] |
2.4 ms | 2.1 ms | +14.34% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=16384/indices=1000] |
10.8 ms | 9.6 ms | +13.03% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take[core/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=1024/indices=10000] |
14.8 ms | 13.1 ms | +12.28% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress[u64, (1000, 16)] |
72.2 µs | 64.9 µs | +11.1% |
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ct/primitive-binary-operands (3c1d820) with develop (5794e7d)
Footnotes
-
85 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
Loading