2 benchmarks regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2203 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 287 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | WallTime | dbp_assemble_kernel_avx512[(I128, 1024)] |
466 ns | 549 ns | -15.12% |
| ❌ | Simulation | take_fsl_f16_random[256, 100] |
204.8 µs | 230.9 µs | -11.3% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_fsl_u32_random[16, 100] |
165.7 µs | 126.1 µs | +31.45% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_fsl_nullable_random[16, 100] |
187.8 µs | 165.3 µs | +13.62% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | dbp_assemble_kernel_neon[(I128, 1024)] |
451 ns | 408 ns | +10.54% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing mk/bitpacked-stack-07-width-selection (d9bf61d) with mk/bitpacked-stack-06-v2-wire (377f70c)
Footnotes
-
287 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩