docs: versioning model and proofs (draft) - #9950
connortsui20 wants to merge 1 commit into
Performance Regression: -1.57%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2248 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 218 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | WallTime | filtered_owned_i64_avx2[OneNullInEight] |
22.3 µs | 25.9 µs | -13.8% |
| ❌ | WallTime | dbp_split_kernel_mixed_null_neon[(I256, 1024)] |
1.9 µs | 2.2 µs | -12.01% |
| ❌ | WallTime | mul_i32_nonnull_avx512 |
7.1 µs | 7.9 µs | -10.39% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress[u64, (4000, 1024)] |
86.6 µs | 71.1 µs | +21.88% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | mul_u32_nonnull_avx512 |
6.3 µs | 5.6 µs | +11.57% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ct/versioning-proof-draft (4595fc3) with develop (c6678f3)
Footnotes
-
218 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩