Performance Regression: -0.08%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2205 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 293 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | take_fsl_nullable_random[16, 100] |
164.3 µs | 190.3 µs | -13.67% |
| ❌ | Simulation | take_fsl_f16_random[256, 100] |
203.7 µs | 231 µs | -11.83% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_fsl_u32_random[256, 10] |
161.6 µs | 123.3 µs | +31.04% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing mk/allowed-serialized-ids (d0198af) with develop (133aacd)
Footnotes
-
293 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩