Skip to content

WIP: adding resize#48

Open
casibbald wants to merge 1 commit into
vv9k:masterfrom
microscaler:feature/add-Container-tty-resize
Open

WIP: adding resize#48
casibbald wants to merge 1 commit into
vv9k:masterfrom
microscaler:feature/add-Container-tty-resize

Conversation

@casibbald
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What did you implement:

Closes: #xxx

How did you verify your change:

What (if anything) would need to be called out in the CHANGELOG for the next release:

@casibbald casibbald mentioned this pull request Feb 20, 2023
@casibbald casibbald changed the title adding resize WIP: adding resize Feb 20, 2023
@spelltasticsoup spelltasticsoup force-pushed the feature/add-Container-tty-resize branch 5 times, most recently from 696a7d1 to 43fa6f1 Compare February 21, 2023 13:01
@spelltasticsoup spelltasticsoup force-pushed the feature/add-Container-tty-resize branch from 43fa6f1 to 127c94f Compare February 21, 2023 13:06
Comment thread src/builder.rs
}}
};
(
Reize $it:ident: $base:ident -> $resp:ident $ep:expr, $ret:expr $(, $extra:expr)*
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd suggest implementing it straight in src/api/container.rs as this macros are mostly for methods that appear on multiple structs like inspect or list. As the time passes I'm personally leaning more towards implementing it directly for each struct rather than by macro as it improves code search-ability.

@vv9k
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

vv9k commented Mar 25, 2023

Hey @casibbald , It's been a while and I was thinking of adding this. Do you still plan on working on this?

@casibbald
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

casibbald commented Mar 25, 2023 via email

@vv9k
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

vv9k commented Mar 25, 2023

Sure thing :) Just wanted to confirm you still want to work on this. Thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants