Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: Avoid redundant O(N) ToDictionary allocation in AddReachabilityWarnings hot path#291

Open
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
bolt/perf-hoist-dictionary-allocation-7416659520300016891
Open

⚡ Bolt: Avoid redundant O(N) ToDictionary allocation in AddReachabilityWarnings hot path#291
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
bolt/perf-hoist-dictionary-allocation-7416659520300016891

Conversation

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Extract ToDictionary() edge mapping allocation outside of the producer/consumer loop within AddReachabilityWarnings.
🎯 Why: HasPermittedPath is executed repeatedly within nested LINQ .Any() queries iterating over $P$ producers and $C$ consumers. Previously, the dictionary was rebuilt on each path check, causing continuous $O(E)$ memory allocations and CPU overhead on a hot path $O(P \times C \times E)$.
📊 Impact: Reduces redundant dictionary allocations and CPU overhead to a single $O(E)$ pre-allocation. Will yield measurable speedups for networks with a large number of nodes and edges validating reachability constraints.
🔬 Measurement: Full test suite executes successfully locally. Verified via unit and benchmark coverage maintaining current bounds.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 7416659520300016891 started by @wnj00524

…habilityWarnings

Hoists the `network.Edges.ToDictionary` call outside of the nested `HasPermittedPath` verification loop. Previously, this dictionary was built on every path check iteration, resulting in O(P*C*E) overhead, which has now been reduced to a single O(E) pre-computation.
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants